Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720807›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Phenotype Discordance between Primary Tumor and Metastasis Impacts Metastasis Site and Outcome: Results of WSG-DETECT-PriMet.

Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke, Rachel Wuerstlein, Oleg Gluz, Florian Heitz, Muriel Freudenberger, Elena Bensmann, Andreas du Bois, Ulrike Nitz, Enrico Pelz, Matthias Warm and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelia Kolberg-LiedtkeKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinBreast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany.
Oleg GluzWest German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Florian HeitzDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Muriel FreudenbergerWest German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Elena BensmannAbteilung für Gynäkologie, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Andreas du BoisDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Ulrike NitzWest German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Enrico PelzInstitut für Pathologie, Viersen, Germany.
Matthias WarmBrustzentrum, Krankenhaus Köln-Holweide, Cologne, Germany.
Monika OrtmannInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Elena SultovaInstitut für Pathologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartement für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ronald E KatesWest German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Tanja FehmKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda Mönchengladbach · DEGerman Breast group · DEHelios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DECentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEKlinik für Frauenheilkunde · DEKrankenhaus Köln-Holweide · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELVR-Klinik für Orthopädie Viersen · DERotkreuzklinikum München · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTumor biological factors of breast cancer (BC) such as hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and grade can differ in the metastatic cascade from primary to lymph node (LN) metastasis and to distant metastatic tissue. Systematic data regarding therapeutic consequences are yet limited.

methodsWe conducted a prospectively planned, retrospective cohort study comparing BC phenotype in tissue from primary tumors (PTs), locoregional LN metastases, and disease recurrence (DR). HR and HER2 as well as tumor grade in PTs and DR were obtained by a database search. No centralized biomarker testing was performed. The impact of changes in tumor biological factors on post-recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival was analyzed.

resultsPriMet comprises 635 patients (LN tissue in 142 patients). Discrepancies for HR or HER2 status between PT and DR were observed in 18.7 and 21.6% of cases, respectively. For HR status, positivity of PT and negativity of DR was seen more often (13.2%) than vice versa (5.5%). For HER2 status, negativity of the primary and positivity of DR was seen more often (14.9%) than vice versa (6.7%). Discordance was more often observed between PT and LN metastasis compared to LN versus DR. However, numbers were small. Compared to concordant non-triple-negative (TN) disease, concordant TN disease showed significantly inferior PRS.

conclusionWe demonstrate receptor discordance to occur relatively frequently between PT, LN metastasis, and DR and to impact patient prognosis. However, clinical consequences of receptor discordance need to be drawn with caution considering clinical aspects as well as tumor biology.

Indexed as

Breast cancerHER2HeterogeneityHormone receptorsMetastases

Identifiers

PMID34720807
PMCPMC8543305
OpenAlexW3111173295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.