Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720805›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.

Lea Beier, Andree Faridi, Corina Neumann, Stefan Paepke, Christine Mau, Maren Keller, Hans Joachim Strittmatter, Claudia Gerber-Schäfer, Lelia Bauer, Maria Margarete Karsten and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Lea BeierGynecology and Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andree FaridiSenology and Breast Center, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Corina NeumannBreast Center, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Stefan PaepkeComprehensive Cancer Center, Brustzentrum der Technischen Universität München Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Christine MauGynecology, Breast Center, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Maren KellerNord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie e.V., Berlin, Germany.
Hans Joachim StrittmatterGynecology, Rems-Murr-Hospital Winnenden, Winnenden, Germany.
Claudia Gerber-SchäferBreast Center, Vivantes Hospital am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
Lelia BauerGynecology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany.
Maria Margarete KarstenGynecology and Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sherko KümmelBreast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Germany.
Jens-Uwe BlohmerGynecology and Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DENord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DERems-Murr-Klinikum · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decades, the number of acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions (IBBR) has substantially increased. However, there is still a lack of prospective data on complication rates.

methodsWe performed a non-interventional, multicenter, prospective cohort study to evaluate complication rates of a human ADM in patients undergoing an IBBR after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies. Patients with primary reconstruction (cohort A) and patients undergoing a secondary reconstruction after capsular fibrosis (cohort B) using the human ADM Epiflex® (DIZG gGmbH, Berlin, Germany) were enrolled in this study. Patients were followed-up for 12 months after surgery.

resultsEighty-four eligible patients were included in this study of whom 28 women underwent a bilateral breast reconstruction, leading to 112 human ADM-assisted reconstructions in total (cohort A: 73, cohort B: 39). In 33.0% of the reconstructed breasts at least one of the complications of primary interest occurred, including implant loss 7.1%, seroma 15.2%; infection 5.4%, rash 8.0%, and Baker grade III/IV capsular fibrosis 2.7%, with no statistically significant differences between the cohorts. Previous radiation therapy was significantly associated with occurrence of any postoperative complication (OR 20.41;

conclusionThe rates of most complications were comparable to the rates reported for other ADMs with relatively low rates of capsular fibrosis and infections. The rate of seroma was increased in our study. Prior radiation therapy increased the risk of any postoperative complications. Therefore, the use of ADM in these patients should be considered carefully.

Indexed as

Breast reconstructionCapsular fibrosisComplicationsHuman acellular dermal matrix

Identifiers

PMID34720805
PMCPMC8543307
OpenAlexW3112391294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.