ArticleClean technologies and environmental policy2022
Novel sustainable metallic powder production process with water used as milling medium.
Article in Clean technologies and environmental policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, Fe-Al intermetallic compounds are receiving a great interest from the mechanical, aerospace, and biomedical industries. A novel production process for Fe-Al intermetallic powders based on the generation of metallic tapes by rapid solidification and disintegration by water vapor was proposed. In this research work, a comparison is made between the energy required to manufacture of Fe-Al powder using the aforementioned process and one of the most commonly used manufacturing processes within the industry such as mechanical alloying. In addition, some other benefits of the proposed manufacturing process are analyzed. To carry out this comparison, the theoretical equations that take into account the most important variables involved during the process such as the type of material and hardness, the initial and final particle size, the grinding stages and the heating of the treatment powder were considered. In the case of calculating the energy required for the new proposed process, the two main stages were considered such as (1) the production of FeAl metal tape and (2) the subsequent transformation of the tape into powder by means of injection water vapor. For the first stage, the CASTRIP process is considered, and for the second stage, the energy required for the generation steam. Although the calculations may have certain limitations, it is obvious that the energy required to Fe-Al powder production using the new process is much lower than that required by mechanical alloying, resulting in at least three orders of magnitude lower (2.75 × 10 Graphic abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.