Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720729›Full record

ReviewThe European physical journal. D, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics2021

Quantum battles in attoscience: tunnelling.

Cornelia Hofmann, Alexander Bray, Werner Koch, Hongcheng Ni, Nikolay I Shvetsov-Shilovski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European physical journal. D, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantum aspects of attoscience.The European physical journal. D, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics · 2022
    Article
  3. Dialogue on analytical and ab initio methods in attoscience.The European physical journal. D, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cornelia HofmannDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-5564
Alexander BrayResearch School of Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3780-3312
Werner KochWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Hongcheng NiState Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241 China.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-0921
Nikolay I Shvetsov-ShilovskiInstitut für Theoretische Physik, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8825-9302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractWhat is the nature of tunnelling? This yet unanswered question is as pertinent today as it was at the dawn of quantum mechanics. This article presents a cross section of current perspectives on the interpretation, computational modelling, and numerical investigation of tunnelling processes in attosecond physics as debated in the Quantum Battles in Attoscience virtual workshop 2020. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT:

Identifiers

PMID34720729
PMCPMC8550434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.