Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720573›Full record

ArticleUrban ecosystems2021

'Stray appetites': a socio-ecological analysis of free-ranging dogs living alongside human communities in Bangalore, India.

Shireen Jagriti Bhalla, Roy Kemmers, Ana Vasques, Abi Tamim Vanak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban ecosystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Optimising rabies vaccination of dogs in India.Epidemiology and infection · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Towards dog-free hospital campuses in India.The Indian journal of medical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shireen Jagriti BhallaErasmus University College, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9048-2127
Roy Kemmers *Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-2278
Ana Vasques *Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-8100
Abi Tamim Vanak *Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-4260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the developing world, humans and free-ranging domestic dogs share common spaces. The relationship between these dogs and humans can range from one of dependence, to apathy, to conflict. Given the high number of humans attacked by dogs every year in India, and the lack of an effective population control strategy, we seek to provide insights into the conflict and propose alternative population management options based on reducing the carrying capacity of the environment. We used a mixed methods approach to understand both ecological and sociological underpinnings of free-ranging dog-human relationships in Bangalore, India. We conducted a photographic capture-recapture survey of free-ranging dogs to estimate population size and linked it to the availability of potential food sources. We also conducted a qualitative survey to assess attitudes of residents towards the dog population. We found that dog population varied from 192 to 1888 per square kilometre across a gradient of housing densities. The density of houses, bakeries and garbage piles were significant predictors of dog population size. Crucially, as low as 10 to 18% of houses supported the large population of dogs, highlighting the need for residents to act responsibly towards the dogs. Further, we found that garbage, although significant, is a secondary food source to household-maintained dogs. Since on the whole, respondents expressed the desire for a reduction in dog population, we suggest decreasing the carrying capacity of the environment by targeting these three food sources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-021-01097-4.

Indexed as

AttitudesFood sourcesFree-ranging dog populationsSocio-economic groups

Identifiers

PMID34720573
PMCPMC8551108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.