ArticleConference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics2018
Single-Trial Classification of Disfluent Brain States in Adults Who Stutter.
Article in Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal explainable AI predicts upcoming speech behavior in adults who stutter.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Interpretable Self-Supervised Facial Micro-Expression Learning to Predict Cognitive State and Neurological Disorders.Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2021Article
- The Application of EEG Mu Rhythm Measures to Neurophysiological Research in Stuttering.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- A novel non-word speech preparation task to increase stuttering frequency in experimental settings for longitudinal research.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Normal human speech requires precise coordination between motor planning and sensory processing. Speech disfluencies are common when children learn to talk, but usually abate with time. About 5% of children experience stuttering. For most, this resolves within a year. However, for approximately 1% of the world population, stuttering continues into adulthood, which is termed 'persistent developmental stuttering'. Most stuttering events occur at the beginning of an utterance. So, in principle, brain activity before speaking should differ between fluent and stuttered speech. Here we present a method for classifying brain network states associated with fluent vs. stuttered speech on a single trial basis. Brain activity was recorded with EEG before people who stutter read aloud pseudo-word pairs. Offline independent component analysis (ICA) was used to identify the independent neural sources that underlie speech preparation. A time window selection algorithm extracted spectral power and coherence data from salient windows specific to each neural source. A stepwise linear discriminant analysis (sLDA) algorithm predicted fluent vs. stuttered speech for 81% of trials in two subjects. These results support the feasibility of developing a brain-computer interface (BCI) system to detect stuttering before it occurs, with potential for therapeutic application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.