Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720426›Full record

ArticleSafety science2021

Adapting to the unexpected: Problematic work situations and resilience strategies in healthcare institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave.

Typhaine M Juvet, Sandrine Corbaz-Kurth, Pauline Roos, Lamyae Benzakour, Sara Cereghetti, Gregory Moullec, Jean-Claude Suard, Laure Vieux, Hannah Wozniak, Jacques A Pralong and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Typhaine M JuvetArc School of Health, HES-SO, Neuchâtel & Delémont, Switzerland.
Sandrine Corbaz-KurthArc School of Health, HES-SO, Neuchâtel & Delémont, Switzerland.
Pauline RoosArc School of Health, HES-SO, Neuchâtel & Delémont, Switzerland.
Lamyae BenzakourGeneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sara CereghettiGeneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gregory MoullecSchool of Public Health, University of Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Claude SuardGeneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laure VieuxGeneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hannah WozniakGeneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacques A PralongGeneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rafaël WeissbrodtSchool of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Sion, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHHES-SO Arc · CHHES-SO Valais-Wallis · CHUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic's first wave required considerable adaptation efforts on the part of healthcare workers. The literature on resilient healthcare describes how the collective regulation strategies implemented by frontline employees make essential contributions to institutions' abilities to cope with major crises. The present mixed-methodology study was thus conducted among a large sample of employees in a variety of Swiss healthcare institutions and focused on problematic real-world situations experienced by them and their managers during the pandemic's first wave. It highlighted the anticipatory and adaptive strategies implemented by institutions, teams and individuals. The most frequently cited problematic situations involved organisational changes, interpersonal conflicts and workloads. In addition to the numerous top-down measures implemented by institutions, respondents also identified personal or team regulation strategies such as increasing staff flexibility, prioritising tasks, interprofessional collaboration, peer support or creating new communication channels to families. The present findings underlined the importance of taking greater account of healthcare support staff and strengthening managerial capacity to support interprofessional teams including those support staff.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicHealthcare resilienceMixed methodsOrganisational resilience

Identifiers

PMID34720426
PMCPMC8545718
OpenAlexW3152251636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.