ArticleMinds and machines2021
Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics.
Article in Minds and machines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Acceptability of AI-Powered Tools for Early Autism Screening in Egypt: Semistructured Focus Group Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Embedding ethics into Genomics England's Generation Study.BMJ open · 2026Review
- AI Ethics Guidelines: Time to Include Animals.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- The rise of checkbox AI ethics: a review.AI and ethics · 2025Review
- Minimum levels of interpretability for artificial moral agents.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- Ethical Considerations and Equipoise in Cancer Surgery.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Trends and Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Social Media Analysis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Beyond ideals: why the (medical) AI industry needs to motivate behavioural change in line with fairness and transparency values, and how it can do it.AI & society · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence adoption in extended HR ecosystems: enablers and barriers. An abductive case research.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Mapping the flow of knowledge as guidance for ethics implementation in medical AI: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Operationalising AI governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study.AI and ethics · 2023Article
- Are AI systems biased against the poor? A machine learning analysis using Word2Vec and GloVe embeddings.AI & society · 2022Article
- Politics by Automatic Means? A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Ethics at Work.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR).Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the range of potential uses for Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), has increased, so has awareness of the associated ethical issues. This increased awareness has led to the realisation that existing legislation and regulation provides insufficient protection to individuals, groups, society, and the environment from AI harms. In response to this realisation, there has been a proliferation of principle-based ethics codes, guidelines and frameworks. However, it has become increasingly clear that a significant gap exists between the theory of AI ethics principles and the practical design of AI systems. In previous work, we analysed whether it is possible to close this gap between the 'what' and the 'how' of AI ethics through the use of tools and methods designed to help AI developers, engineers, and designers translate principles into practice. We concluded that this method of closure is currently ineffective as almost all existing translational tools and methods are either too flexible (and thus vulnerable to ethics washing) or too strict (unresponsive to context). This raised the question: if, even with technical guidance, AI ethics is challenging to embed in the process of algorithmic design, is the entire pro-ethical design endeavour rendered futile? And, if no, then how can AI ethics be made useful for AI practitioners? This is the question we seek to address here by exploring why principles and technical translational tools are still needed even if they are limited, and how these limitations can be potentially overcome by providing theoretical grounding of a concept that has been termed 'Ethics as a Service.'
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.