Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720409›Full record

ArticleLandscape ecology2022

Effect of disturbances and habitat fragmentation on an arboreal habitat specialist mammal using GPS telemetry: a case of the red panda.

Damber Bista, Greg S Baxter, Nicholas J Hudson, Sonam Tashi Lama, Peter John Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Landscape ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Baseline Activity Patterns of Two Captive Red Pandas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Activity Patterns of Captive Red Panda (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damber BistaSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2699-1642
Greg S BaxterSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343 Australia.
Nicholas J HudsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343 Australia.
Sonam Tashi LamaRed Panda Network, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, 44600 Nepal.
Peter John MurraySchool of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, West St., Darling Heights, Toowoomba, QLD 4350 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHabitat specialists residing in human-modified landscapes are likely to be more vulnerable to disturbance because of a functional reliance on very particular habitat features. However, there have been few studies designed to specifically address that issue.

objectivesThis study aimed to explore how the red panda, an iconic endangered habitat specialist, behaves when faced with disturbances and habitat fragmentation. In particular, we attempted to examine the effect of anthropogenic disturbances and fragmentation on home-range size, activity patterns, and recursion.

methodsUsing GPS telemetry we monitored 10 red pandas and documented disturbances using camera trapping for one year in eastern Nepal. We performed spatial analysis, analysed activity patterns and evaluated the effect of habitat fragmentation and disturbances on home-range size and residence time using Linear Mixed Models.

resultsHome-range size increased in areas with low availability of forest cover whilst home ranges were smaller in areas with a high road density. Red pandas spent more time in large habitat patches away from roads and cattle stations. Crossing rates suggested that roads acted as a barrier for movement across their habitat. Red pandas also partitioned their activity to minimize interactions with disturbances.

conclusionsRed pandas seem to make a trade-off to co-exist in human-dominated landscapes which may have adverse long-term effects on their survival. This indicates that current patterns of habitat fragmentation and forest exploitation may be adversely affecting red panda conservation efforts and that landscape-scale effects should be considered when planning conservation actions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-021-01357-w.

Indexed as

Activity patternAnthropogenic disturbancesBarrier effectHabitat fragmentationHome rangeResidence time

Identifiers

PMID34720409
PMCPMC8542365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.