Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720401›Full record

ArticleEcography2021

A global perspective on the functional responses of stream communities to flow intermittence.

Julie Crabot, Cedric P Mondy, Philippe Usseglio-Polatera, Ken M Fritz, Paul J Wood, Michelle J Greenwood, Michael T Bogan, Elisabeth I Meyer, Thibault Datry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-perennial segments in river networks.Nature reviews. Earth & environment · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julie CrabotCNRS, GEOLAB, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-993X
Cedric P MondyFrench Biodiversity Agency, Vincennes, France.
Philippe Usseglio-PolateraUniv. of Lorraine, CNRS, LIEC, Metz, France.
Ken M FritzOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Paul J WoodLoughborough Univ., Leicestershire, UK.
Michelle J GreenwoodNational Inst. of Water and Atmospheric Research, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Michael T BoganOregon State Univ., Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Elisabeth I MeyerUniv. of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thibault DatryINRAE, UR RiverLY, Lyon-Villeurbanne, France.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current erosion of biodiversity is a major concern that threatens the ecological integrity of ecosystems and the ecosystem services they provide. Due to global change, an increasing proportion of river networks are drying and changes from perennial to non-perennial flow regimes represent dramatic ecological shifts with potentially irreversible alterations of community and ecosystem dynamics. However, there is minimal understanding of how biological communities respond functionally to drying. Here, we highlight the taxonomic and functional responses of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities to flow intermittence across river networks from three continents, to test predictions from underlying trait-based conceptual theory. We found a significant breakpoint in the relationship between taxonomic and functional richness, indicating higher functional redundancy at sites with flow intermittence higher than 28%. Multiple strands of evidence, including patterns of alpha and beta diversity and functional group membership, indicated that functional redundancy did not compensate for biodiversity loss associated with increasing intermittence, contrary to received wisdom. A specific set of functional trait modalities, including small body size, short life span and high fecundity, were selected with increasing flow intermittence. These results demonstrate the functional responses of river communities to drying and suggest that on-going biodiversity reduction due to global change in drying river networks is threatening their functional integrity. These results indicate that such patterns might be common in these ecosystems, even where drying is considered a predictable disturbance. This highlights the need for the conservation of natural drying regimes of intermittent rivers to secure their ecological integrity.

Indexed as

biodiversity lossfragmentationglobal changelife-history traitstemporary rivers

Identifiers

PMID34720401
PMCPMC8554635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.