Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720245›Full record

ArticleClinical social work journal2022

Meredith Hemphill Ruden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical social work journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Meredith Hemphill RudenCity Center Psychotherapy, The Feather Foundation, 52 Riggs Place, South Orange, NJ 07079 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-3821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this preliminary study, social workers' experiences of adjustment and loss during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic were explored as they, along with their clients, coped with the resulting emotional and psychological impacts. As death and illness rates increased alarmingly, masters-level social work students' discourses and feedback in a course on grief and loss revealed a knowledge gap surrounding counseling in face of shared loss that led to a pilot study. Subsequently, a qualitative research study (n = 7) of video self-reports from clinical social workers was conducted to further explore their losses and their consequent professional impact. They responded to the question, "What losses have you felt in this pandemic that have impacted you professionally?" Participants listed multiple losses related to work (e.g., loss of professional therapeutic space, loss of the work/life divide) and recognized the challenges to maintaining a personal sense of well-being. In consideration of the pandemic's impact when counseling others, participants identified the following themes: greater emphasis on one's own well-being, greater focus on maintaining strong therapeutic rapport, the value of creativity in the new therapeutic space, and a continual assessment of dynamic shifts. For society to process-which means, largely, to grieve-the losses related to COVID-19 and adjust to the world

Indexed as

CopingCounselingCOVID-19LossPlace changeShared lossTherapyUncertaintyWork from home

Identifiers

PMID34720245
PMCPMC8536896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.