Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720225›Full record

ArticleSynthese2021

Where health and environment meet: the use of invariant parameters in big data analysis.

Sabina Leonelli, Niccolò Tempini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthese, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sabina LeonelliExeter Centre for the Study of the Life Sciences and Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Philosophy, University of Exeter, Byrne House, St Germans Road, Exeter, EX4 4PJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-6609
Niccolò TempiniExeter Centre for the Study of the Life Sciences and Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Philosophy, University of Exeter, Byrne House, St Germans Road, Exeter, EX4 4PJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5100-5376

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K019341/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of big data to investigate the spread of infectious diseases or the impact of the built environment on human wellbeing goes beyond the realm of traditional approaches to epidemiology, and includes a large variety of data objects produced by research communities with different methods and goals. This paper addresses the conditions under which researchers link, search and interpret such diverse data by focusing on "data mash-ups"-that is the linking of data from epidemiology, biomedicine, climate and environmental science, which is typically achieved by holding one or more basic parameters, such as geolocation, as invariant. We argue that this strategy works best when epidemiologists interpret localisation procedures through an idiographic perspective that recognises their context-dependence and supports a critical evaluation of the epistemic value of geolocation data whenever they are used for new research purposes. Approaching invariants as strategic constructs can foster data linkage and re-use, and support carefully-targeted predictions in ways that can meaningfully inform public health. At the same time, it explicitly signals the limitations in the scope and applicability of the original datasets incorporated into big data collections, and thus the situated nature of data linkage exercises and their predictive power.

Indexed as

Data linkageData mash-upsData reuseEpidemiologyGeolocationInferenceLocalisationPredictionPublic health

Identifiers

PMID34720225
PMCPMC8550214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.