Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34719992›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021

Laparoendoscopic single-site compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological acute abdomen in pregnant women.

Danni Jiang, Yang Yang, Xinxin Zhang, Fang He, Yanxia Wu, Jumin Niu, Xiaocui Nie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Management and treatment of breast cancer in pregnant women.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danni JiangGraduate School, 36674Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xinxin ZhangDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Fang HeDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yanxia WuDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Jumin NiuDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xiaocui NieDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-200X
Shenyang First People's Hospital · CNDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in pregnant patients with acute abdomen.

methodsBaseline characteristics, surgical results, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes were retrospectively compared between single and multiport procedures in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy between 2017 and 2021.

resultsFifty-four pregnant patients were included: 26 who underwent LESS (salpingectomy, 11 cases/cystectomy, 15 cases) and 28 who underwent conventional laparoscopic surgeries (salpingectomy, 12 cases/cystectomy, 16 cases) during pregnancy. One patient in the single-port group required additional ports. No patients converted to laparotomy. In patients undergoing salpingectomy, the single-port group showed lower 8- and 24-h postoperative pain scores, shorter hospital stays, and lower Self-rating Anxiety Scale scores prior to discharge versus conventional laparoscopy. One patient experienced postoperative vaginal bleeding and a missed abortion during follow-up. In patients receiving cystectomy, 8- and 24-h pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, and anxiety scores were lower in the single-port versus multiport group. Other outcomes were comparable between the groups.

conclusionThe feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy is similar between single- or multiport routes, however, the single-port route may be associated with less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and lower anxiety.

Indexed as

Abdomen, AcuteLaparoscopyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleRetrospective StudiesSalpingectomyAcute abdomencystectomylaparoendoscopic single-site surgerylaparoscopepregnancysalpingectomysingle port

Identifiers

PMID34719992
PMCPMC8562634
OpenAlexW3210892161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.