Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34719770›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2022

Portuguese wild hop diversity assessment by fast SNP genotyping using high-resolution melting.

Julio C Machado, Miguel A Faria, Ana Maria Barata, Isabel Gomes da Silva, Andreja Cerenak, Isabel M P L V O Ferreira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julio C MachadoLAQV/REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Bromatologia e Hidrologia, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.
Miguel A FariaLAQV/REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Bromatologia e Hidrologia, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal. mfaria@ff.up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-0443
Ana Maria BarataBanco Português de Germoplasma Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Quinta de S. José, S. Pedro de Merelim, 4700-859, Braga, Portugal.
Isabel Gomes da SilvaBanco Português de Germoplasma Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Quinta de S. José, S. Pedro de Merelim, 4700-859, Braga, Portugal.
Andreja CerenakSlovenian Institute of Hop Research and Brewing, Cesta Zalskega Tabora 2, 3310, Zalec, Slovenia.
Isabel M P L V O FerreiraLAQV/REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Bromatologia e Hidrologia, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A set of seven SNP markers was used to evaluate the genetic diversity of wild Portuguese hops in comparison with commercial cultivars. A collection of 110 wild genotypes and 33 cultivars was characterized by a high-resolution melting analysis of short amplicons targeting SNP loci. Most of the 143 genotypes (75%) could be differentiated. Phylogenetic analysis showed three main clusters, one included almost exclusively (98%) wild accessions, being the others constituted of both wild and commercial genotypes. The study of population genetic structure placed the accessions into three genetic units, being one exclusively of Portuguese genotypes. The study showed the great biodiversity of the Portuguese hop germplasm and the notable differences (F

Indexed as

HumulusAllelesGenetic VariationGenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePortugalHop germplasmHRMAPopulation structurePortuguese wild hopsSNP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.