Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34719725›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

The radiological interpretation of possible microbleeds after moderate or severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study.

Anke W van der Eerden, Thomas L A van den Heuvel, Marnix C Maas, Priya Vart, Pieter E Vos, Bram Platel, Bozena M Góraj, Rashindra Manniesing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anke W van der EerdenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. a.vandereerden@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-9089
Thomas L A van den HeuvelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-7693
Marnix C MaasDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-521X
Priya VartDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-820X
Pieter E VosDepartment of Neurology, Santiz-Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7182-9981
Bram PlatelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-6825
Bozena M GórajDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3605-7933
Rashindra ManniesingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-6298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn order to augment the certainty of the radiological interpretation of "possible microbleeds" after traumatic brain injury (TBI), we assessed their longitudinal evolution on 3-T SWI in patients with moderate/severe TBI.

methodsStandardized 3-T SWI and T1-weighted imaging were obtained 3 and 26 weeks after TBI in 31 patients. Their microbleeds were computer-aided detected and classified by a neuroradiologist as no, possible, or definite at baseline and follow-up, separately (single-scan evaluation). Thereafter, the classifications were re-evaluated after comparison between the time-points (post-comparison evaluation). We selected the possible microbleeds at baseline at single-scan evaluation and recorded their post-comparison classification at follow-up.

resultsOf the 1038 microbleeds at baseline, 173 were possible microbleeds. Of these, 53.8% corresponded to no microbleed at follow-up. At follow-up, 30.6% were possible and 15.6% were definite. Of the 120 differences between baseline and follow-up, 10% showed evidence of a pathophysiological change over time. Proximity to extra-axial injury and proximity to definite microbleeds were independently predictive of becoming a definite microbleed at follow-up. The reclassification level differed between anatomical locations.

conclusionsOur findings support disregarding possible microbleeds in the absence of clinical consequences. In selected cases, however, a follow-up SWI-scan could be considered to exclude evolution into a definite microbleed.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticMagnetic Resonance ImagingCerebral HemorrhageHumansLongitudinal StudiesRadiographyBrain injuriesCerebral hemorrhageDiffuse axonal injury,Longitudinal studiesMagnetic resonance imagingTraumatic

Identifiers

PMID34719725
PMCPMC9117345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.