ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021
Linked-color Imaging May Help Improve the Visibility of Superficial Barrett's Esophageal Adenocarcinoma by Increasing the Color Difference.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visibility Evaluation of Fundic Gland Polyp Associated With Proton Pump Inhibitor in Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging.DEN open · 2026Article
- Development of an Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System Using Linked Color Imaging for Barrett's Esophagus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Role of linked color imaging for upper gastrointestinal disease: present and future.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Comparison of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging with White Light Imaging in 52 Patients with Short-Segment Barrett's Esophagus.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Clinical Usefulness of Linked Color Imaging for Detection and Characterization of UndifferentiatedType Early Gastric Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Basics and Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Linked-color imaging (LCI), a new technology for image-enhanced endoscopy, emphasizes the color of the mucosa, and its practicality in the detection of early gastric and colon cancers has been reported. However, whether or not LCI is useful for the diagnosis of Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BA) has been unclear. In this study, we explored whether or not LCI enhances the color difference between a BA lesion and the surrounding mucosa. Methods Twenty-one lesions from 20 consecutive patients with superficial BA who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection between November 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively examined. The color differences (ΔE*) between the inside and outside of the lesion were evaluated retrospectively using white-light imaging (WLI), blue-light imaging (BLI), and LCI objectively, based on a Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) lab color system. Furthermore, we compared the morphology, color, and circumferential location of the lesion. Results The median values of the color difference (ΔE*) in WLI and BLI were 9.1 and 5.8, respectively, and no difference was observed. In LCI, the median color difference was 17.6, which was higher than that of WLI and BLI. Regardless of the morphology, color, and circumferential location of BA lesions, the color difference was larger in LCI than in WLI. Conclusion LCI increases the color difference between the BA and the surrounding Barrett's mucosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.