Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34719600›Full record

ArticleIndustrial health2022

Particle measurements of metal additive manufacturing to assess working occupational exposures: a comparative analysis of selective laser melting, laser metal deposition and hybrid laser metal deposition.

Enrico Oddone, Roberta Pernetti, Maria Lorena Fiorentino, Elena Grignani, Daniele Tamborini, Gianluca Alaimo, Ferdinando Auricchio, Barbara Previtali, Marcello Imbriani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification of effective control technologies for additive manufacturing.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enrico OddoneDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy.
Roberta PernettiDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy.
Maria Lorena FiorentinoCentro di Ricerche Ambientali, ICS Maugeri, Italy.
Elena GrignaniCentro di Ricerche Ambientali, ICS Maugeri, Italy.
Daniele TamboriniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
Gianluca AlaimoDIII, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Italy.
Ferdinando AuricchioDICAR, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Italy.
Barbara PrevitaliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
Marcello ImbrianiDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a measurement campaign for assessing the release of particles and the potential exposure of workers in metal additive manufacturing. The monitoring deals with three environments, i.e., two academic laboratories and one production site, while printing different metallic alloys for chemical composition and size. The monitored devices implement different metal 3D printing processes, named Selective Laser Melting, Laser Metal Deposition and Hybrid Laser Metal Deposition, providing a wide overview of the current laser-based Additive Manufacturing technologies. Despite showing the generation of metal powders during the printing processes, the usual measurements based on gravimetric analysis did not highlight concentrations higher than the international exposure limits for the selected metals (i.e., chromium, cobalt, iron, nickel, and copper). Additional data, collected through a cascade impactor and particle counter coupled with the achievements from previous measurements reported in literature, indicate that during the printing operations, fine and ultrafine metal particles might be generated. Finally, the authors introduced a preliminary characterisation of the particles released during the different phases of the investigated AM processes (powder charging, printing, part cleaning and support removal), highlighting how the different operations may affect the particle size and concentration.

Indexed as

MetalsParticulate MatterChromiumHumansLasersParticle SizeChromiumMetalsParticulate MatterAdditive manufacturingFine particlesMetal particle exposureMetal particle releaseOccupational health

Identifiers

PMID34719600
PMCPMC9453568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.