ArticleTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences2021
Phytochemical Characterization of Phenolic Compounds by LC-MS/MS and Biological Activities of
Article in Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- LC-MS profiling and antiulcer mechanisms of Rumex pictus extract and its isolated emodin-8-O-β-glucoside against ethanol-induced gastric damage.Journal of natural medicines · 2026Article
- Comparative Phytochemical Characterization and Bioactivity Profiling of SerbianPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative metabolomic profiling and nutritional chemistry ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023Article
- Enhancement of Antioxidant Properties of the Medicinal Plant, Costus Pictus by Optimization of its Drying and Extraction Criteria.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Sustainable Production ofNutrients · 2023Review
- Characterization and comparative evaluation of wound healing potential of Ajugarin I andFrontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, it was aimed to characterize the phenolic contents of Materials and Methods: Air dried aerial parts of Results: The LC-MS/MS analyses identified 19 compounds. The amount of total phenolics ranged from 30.0 to 42.2 mg gallic acid equivalent/g in all extracts. According to the results of TEAC assay, the tested extracts were found to have relatively high activity at 1.2-1.5 mM concentrations. Conclusion: The antioxidant activities of all extracts were determined for the first time by the TEAK method, and the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.