Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34719122›Full record

Trial reportPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2022

The effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Jacek Cholewicki, John M Popovich, N Peter Reeves, Lisa A DeStefano, Jacob J Rowan, Timothy J Francisco, Lawrence L Prokop, Mathew A Zatkin, Angela S Lee, Alla Sikorskii and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacek CholewickiCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3682-6448
John M PopovichCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
N Peter ReevesCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Lisa A DeStefanoCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Jacob J RowanCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Timothy J FranciscoCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Lawrence L ProkopCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Mathew A ZatkinCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Angela S LeeCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Alla SikorskiiDepartment of Psychiatry Osteopathic Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Pramod K PathakCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Jongeun ChoiCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Clark J RadcliffeCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Ahmed RamadanCenter for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Michigan State University · USMichigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy · US

Funding

Systems Science Center for Musculoskeletal CAM TherapiesU19AT006057 · NCCIH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHOLEWICKI, JACEK, REEVES, NORMAN PETER · 2010 to 2016
$4.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT006057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeck pain (NP) affects up to 70% of individuals at some point in their lives. Systematic reviews indicate that manual treatments can be moderately effective in the management of chronic, nonspecific NP. However, there is a paucity of studies specifically evaluating the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT).

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of OMT in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic NP.

designSingle-blinded, cross-over, randomized-controlled trial.

settingUniversity-based, osteopathic manipulative medicine outpatient clinic.

participantsNinety-seven participants, 21 to 65 years of age, with chronic, nonspecific NP.

interventionsParticipants were randomized to two trial arms: immediate OMT intervention or waiting period first. The intervention consisted of three to four OMT sessions over 4 to 6 weeks, after which the participants switched groups.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome measures were pain intensity (average and current) on the numerical rating scale and Neck Disability Index. Secondary outcomes included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) health domains and Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Outcomes obtained prior to the cross-over allocation were evaluated using general linear models and after adjusting for baseline values.

resultsA total of 38 and 37 participants were available for the analysis in the OMT and waiting period groups, respectively. The results showed significantly better primary outcomes in the immediate OMT group for reductions in average pain (-1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.72, -0.32; p = .005), current pain (-1.02, 95% CI -1.75, -0.30; p = .006), disability (-5.30%, 95% CI -9.2%, -1.3%; p = .010) and improved secondary outcomes (PROMIS) related to sleep (-3.25, 95% CI -6.95, -1.54; p = .003), fatigue (-3.26, 95% CI -6.04, -0.48; p = .022), and depression (-2.59, 95% CI -4.73, -0.45; p = .018). The effect sizes were in the clinically meaningful range between 0.5 and 1 standard deviation. No study-related serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsOMT is relatively safe and effective in reducing pain and disability along with improving sleep, fatigue, and depression in patients with chronic NP immediately following treatment delivered over approximately 4 to 6 weeks.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainManipulation, OsteopathicFatigueHumansNeck PainTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34719122
PMCPMC9054945
OpenAlexW3211006265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.