Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34719074›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Genomic prediction in the wild: A case study in Soay sheep.

Bilal Ashraf, Darren C Hunter, Camillo Bérénos, Philip A Ellis, Susan E Johnston, Jill G Pilkington, Josephine M Pemberton, Jon Slate

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Caprine and Ovine Genomic Selection-Progress and Application.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  7. Microevolutionary change in wild stickleback: Using integrative time-series data to infer responses to selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Taking quantitative genomics into the wild.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bilal AshrafSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Darren C HunterSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Camillo BérénosInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Philip A EllisInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Susan E JohnstonInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jill G PilkingtonInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Josephine M PembertonInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jon SlateSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-5123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction, the technique whereby an individual's genetic component of their phenotype is estimated from its genome, has revolutionised animal and plant breeding and medical genetics. However, despite being first introduced nearly two decades ago, it has hardly been adopted by the evolutionary genetics community studying wild organisms. Here, genomic prediction is performed on eight traits in a wild population of Soay sheep. The population has been the focus of a >30 year evolutionary ecology study and there is already considerable understanding of the genetic architecture of the focal Mendelian and quantitative traits. We show that the accuracy of genomic prediction is high for all traits, but especially those with loci of large effect segregating. Five different methods are compared, and the two methods that can accommodate zero-effect and large-effect loci in the same model tend to perform best. If the accuracy of genomic prediction is similar in other wild populations, then there is a real opportunity for pedigree-free molecular quantitative genetics research to be enabled in many more wild populations; currently the literature is dominated by studies that have required decades of field data collection to generate sufficiently deep pedigrees. Finally, some of the potential applications of genomic prediction in wild populations are discussed.

Indexed as

GenomePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypeSheepgenetic architecturegenomic predictiongenomic selectionmolecular quantitative genetics

Identifiers

PMID34719074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.