ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Prokaryotic Genome Annotation.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An informatic workflow for the enhanced annotation of excretory/secretory proteins ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Computation-aided studies related to the induction of specialized metabolite biosynthesis in microbial co-cultures: An introductory overview.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, the high-throughput and relatively low cost of short-read sequencing technologies have revolutionized prokaryotic genomics. This has led to an exponential increase in the number of bacterial and archaeal genome sequences available, as well as corresponding increase of genome assembly and annotation tools developed. Together, these hardware and software technologies have given scientists unprecedented options to study their chosen microbial systems without the need for large teams of bioinformaticists or supercomputing facilities. While these analysis tools largely fall into only a few categories, each may have different requirements, caveats and file formats, and some may be rarely updated or even abandoned. And so, despite the apparent ease in sequencing and analyzing a prokaryotic genome, it is no wonder that the budding genomicist may quickly find oneself overwhelmed. Here, we aim to provide the reader with an overview of genome annotation and its most important considerations, as well as an easy-to-follow protocol to get started with annotating a prokaryotic genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34718997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.