Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34718891›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021

Stroke Prevention in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale.

Alison Thaler, Alexandra Kvernland, Sean Kelly, Christopher Song, Hugo J Aparicio, Brian Mac Grory, Shadi Yaghi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alison ThalerDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra KvernlandDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sean KellyDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Hugo J AparicioDepartment of Neurology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian Mac GroryDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Shadi YaghiDepartment of Neurology, Brown University, 593 Eddy Street APC 5, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. shadiyaghi@yahoo.com.
New York University · USBoston University · USBrown University · USDuke University · USProvidence College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPatent foramen ovale (PFO) is widely prevalent and studies have suggested an association with ischemic stroke. In this review, we aim to highlight current management of patients with ischemic stroke in the setting of PFO and discuss some areas of controversy. RECENT

findingsUpon reviewing the literature, we have found that the evidence regarding the management of patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO has come a long way in the past several years, and many uncertainties remain in clinical practice. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score helps to predict the probability of a pathogenic PFO, and recent trial data confirms the benefit of closure in carefully selected patients. The benefit of closure in older patients and in patients with alternate, competing mechanisms is still uncertain, and the long-term risks of closure are not known. Finally, the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this patient population as compared to other medical therapy or mechanical closure has not yet been investigated. Randomized data is needed to help answer these questions. PFO closure is a safe and effective strategy in reducing stroke risk in carefully selected patients with cryptogenic stroke in the setting of a PFO. More studies are needed to test optimal medical treatment strategies and the safety and efficacy of PFO closure in patient subgroups not included in prior PFO closure trials.

Indexed as

Embolism, ParadoxicalForamen Ovale, PatentStrokeAgedAnticoagulantsHumansRecurrenceSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsPatent foramen ovalePFOPreventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID34718891
OpenAlexW3211064673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.