Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34718850›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Comparison of the effects of platelet-rich plasma and dexamethasone ınjection on scar formation after vocal fold ınjury in rabbits.

Görkem Dündar, Önder Günaydın, Taner Yılmaz, Olcay Kurtulan, Gaye Güler Tezel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Görkem DündarDepartment of Otolaryngology, Dr Nafiz Körez Hospital, Sincan, Ankara, Turkey. drgorkemdundar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-8218
Önder GünaydınDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-9994
Taner YılmazDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-3237
Olcay KurtulanDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-339X
Gaye Güler TezelDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6112-8719
Hacettepe University · TRDünyagöz Hospital · TR

Funding

Hacettepe Üniversitesi 18399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, a histopathological comparison was aimed between platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and dexamethasone injection in the prevention of scar formation after vocal fold injury. MATERIALS AND

methodsElectrocautery was applied to damage the right and left vocal folds of a total of 12 New Zealand rabbits. PRP obtained from the rabbit's own blood was injected into the right vocal fold, and dexamethasone was injected into the left vocal fold. After 8 weeks, the experimental animals were euthanized, and the levels of inflammatory cell infiltration, vascularization, collagen, elastin, and hyaluronic acid (HA) were compared in histopathological evaluation.

resultsIn statistical comparison of histopathological data obtained; in terms of plasma cell infiltration, vascularization, and edema parameters, statistically significant results were obtained in favor of the PRP group. Although the difference between collagen, elastin and HA, which are critical in vocal fold scar healing, was more positive in favor of PRP, no significant result was revealed in the statistical evaluation.

conclusionsPRP injection in rabbits with vocal fold damage reveals similar characteristics with dexamethasone injection in preventing scar formation. PRP injection has favorable effects on vascularization, prevention of edema, and number of plasma cells.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaVocal CordsAnimalsCicatrixDexamethasoneRabbitsWound HealingDexamethasoneDexamethasone injectionPRP injectionVocal fold scar

Identifiers

PMID34718850
OpenAlexW3209686263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.