Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34718845›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

Spermatozoa identification by the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay: a collaborative exercise.

Kuo-Lan Liu, Li-Chin Tsai, Yu-Chih Lin, Yu-Hsuan Chang, Nu-En Huang, Fang-Chin Wu, Chun-Yen Lin, Kuo-Cheng Huang, Chiang-Ho Chen, Tung-Ho Hsieh and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Kuo-Lan LiuForensic Examination Division, Criminal Investigation Bureau, National Police Agency, No.5 Lane 553, Chung Hsiao East Road Section 4, Xinyi District, Taipei, 11072, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Li-Chin TsaiDepartment of Forensic Science, Central Police University, No.56 Shu-Jen Road, Kwei-San, Taoyuan, 33304, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yu-Chih LinTaichung City Government Police Department, No.500 Fengxing Road Section 1, Tanzi District, Taichung City, 427003, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yu-Hsuan ChangDepartment of Forensic Science, Central Police University, No.56 Shu-Jen Road, Kwei-San, Taoyuan, 33304, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Nu-En HuangForensic Biology Division, Criminal Investigation Bureau, National Police Agency, No.5 Lane 553, Chung Hsiao East Road Section 4, Xinyi District, Taipei, 11072, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Fang-Chin WuForensic Science Division, Investigation Bureau, Ministry of Justice, No.74 Zhong-Hua Road, Xindian District, New Taipei City, 231209, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chun-Yen LinForensic Biology Division, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, No.123, Min'an St., Zhonghe Dist., New Taipei City, 235016, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Kuo-Cheng HuangNew Taipei City Government Police Department, No.32, Fuzhong Rd., Banqiao District, New Taipei City, 220222, Republic of China.
Chiang-Ho ChenTaichung City Government Police Department, No.500 Fengxing Road Section 1, Tanzi District, Taichung City, 427003, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Tung-Ho HsiehKaohsiung City Government Police Department, No.260, Jhongjheng 4th Road, Cianjin District, Kaohsiung City, 801207, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Lih-Jing YangInternational Criminal Affairs Division, Criminal Investigation Bureau, National Police Agency, No.5 Lane 553, Chung Hsiao East Road Section 4, Xinyi District, Taipei, 11072, Taiwan, Republic of China.
James Chun-I LeeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.1 Jen-Ai Road Section 1, Taipei, 10051, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Adrian LinacreCollege of Science & Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Hsing-Mei HsiehDepartment of Forensic Science, Central Police University, No.56 Shu-Jen Road, Kwei-San, Taoyuan, 33304, Taiwan, Republic of China. mei@mail.cpu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-1278
Central Police University · TWMinistry of Justice · TWTaichung City Government · TWFlinders University · AUNational Taiwan University · TWPolice Department · LTTaipei City Government · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSC 102-2628-B-015-001-MY2Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan 108-0805-05-17-01/109-0805-05-17-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of semen and spermatozoa is crucial in the forensic investigation of alleged sexual assault cases. In cases of alleged sexual assault where there is a long time gap between the incident and sample collection, or in cases of low sperm count, current methods have limitations of specificity, in the case of presumptive tests for semen, or the problem of recording spermatozoa by microscopy if they are few in number. A 3-plex MSRE-PCR (methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR) assay using a spermatozoa-specific DNA methylated marker to identify spermatozoa has been reported previously by our laboratory. A key advantage over current methods is the increased sensitivity and specificity. A transition from a research tool to operational use requires blind trial testing and inter-laboratory trials. We report on a collaborative exercise where reagents of the 3-plex MSRE-PCR were sent to six participating laboratories. Each laboratory used their own equipment, consumables, and the presumptive reagents conventionally for body fluid (such as acid phosphatase or PSA), DNA extraction, and quantification in practical casework. The reagents and protocol for the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay and 9 samples were provided by the organizing laboratory. The participating laboratories were requested to fill in the questionnaire after testing. The reported results from all the six participating laboratories were concordant and the expected correct results for the presence of spermatozoa. These outcomes verified the reproducibility and feasibility of the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay. The results also indicated that the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay was readily accessible to forensic laboratories for integrating it into current forensic casework processes.

Indexed as

SemenSpermatozoaDNA MethylationHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of Results3-plex MSRE-PCRCollaborative exerciseSexual assaultSpermatozoa identification

Identifiers

PMID34718845
OpenAlexW3209010087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.