ArticleMutagenesis2021
Biomarkers of DNA damage response improve in vitro micronucleus assays by revealing genotoxic mode of action and reducing the occurrence of irrelevant positive results.
Article in Mutagenesis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-functionalized nanostructured lipid carriers with temozolomide: cytotoxic effects and chromosomal instability in human glioblastoma cells.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Hydroxysafflor Yellow A Attenuates Sepsis-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction by Inhibiting Ferroptosis via Activation of Thioredoxin.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- Deep learning and object detection methods for scoring cell types within the human buccal cell micronucleus and cytome assays for human biomonitoring.Mutagenesis · 2026Review
- TGx-DDI (toxicogenomic DNA damage-inducing) biomarker validation: multi-site ring trial supporting regulatory use.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- Interpretation of in vitro concentration-response data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Report from the 2022 IWGT quantitative analysis expert working group meeting.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Review
- Application of Biological Modifiers to a Multiplexed, Human Cell-Based DNA Damage Assay Provides Mechanistic Information on Genotoxicity and Molecular Targets.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
- Influence of Plant Part Selection and Drying Technique: Exploration and Optimization of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of New Guinea Impatiens Extracts.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Visualization strategies to aid interpretation of high-dimensional genotoxicity data.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2024Article
- A Systematic Genotoxicity Assessment of a Suite of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Reveals Their DNA Damaging and Clastogenic Potential.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Revisiting the mutagenicity and genotoxicity of N-nitroso propranolol in bacterial and human in vitro assays.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2023Article
- Application of a new approach methodology (NAM)-based strategy for genotoxicity assessment of data-poor compounds.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have previously described two flow cytometry-based in vitro genotoxicity tests: micronucleus (MN) scoring (MicroFlow®) and a multiplexed DNA damage response biomarker assay (MultiFlow®). Here, we describe a strategy for combining the assays in order to efficiently supplement MN analyses with a panel of biomarkers that comment on cytotoxicity (i.e. relative nuclei count, relative increased nuclei count, cleaved PARP-positive chromatin and ethidium monoazide-positive chromatin) and genotoxic mode of action (MoA; i.e. γH2AX, phospho-histone H3, p53 activation and polyploidy). For these experiments, human TK6 cells were exposed to each of 32 well-studied reference chemicals in 96-well plates for 24 continuous hours. The test chemicals were evaluated over a range of concentrations in the presence and absence of a rat liver S9-based metabolic activation system. MultiFlow assay data were acquired at 4 and 24 h, and micronuclei were scored at 24 h. Testing 32 chemicals in two metabolic activation arms translated into 64 a priori calls: 42 genotoxicants and 22 non-genotoxicants. The MN assay showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity (90% and 68%, respectively). When a genotoxic call required significant MN and MultiFlow responses, specificity increased to 95% without adversely affecting sensitivity. The dose-response data were analysed with PROAST Benchmark Dose (BMD) software in order to calculate potency metrics for each endpoint, and ToxPi software was used to synthesise the resulting lower and upper bound 90% confidence intervals into visual profiles. The BMD/ToxPi combination was found to represent a powerful strategy for synthesising multiple BMD confidence intervals, as the software output provided MoA information as well as insights into genotoxic potency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.