Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34718572›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2022

The Jun-dependent axon regeneration gene program: Jun promotes regeneration over plasticity.

Matthew R J Mason, Susan van Erp, Kim Wolzak, Axel Behrens, Gennadij Raivich, Joost Verhaagen

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Unleashing Intrinsic Growth Pathways in Regenerating Peripheral Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew R J MasonLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Meibergdreef 47, Amsterdam 1105BA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1743-5532
Susan van ErpLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Meibergdreef 47, Amsterdam 1105BA, The Netherlands.
Kim WolzakLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Meibergdreef 47, Amsterdam 1105BA, The Netherlands.
Axel BehrensCancer Stem Cell Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Convergence Science Centre, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BU, UK.
Gennadij RaivichUCL Institute for Women's Health, Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Perinatal Brain Repair Group, London WC1E 6HX, UK.
Joost VerhaagenLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Meibergdreef 47, Amsterdam 1105BA, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regeneration-associated gene (RAG) expression program is activated in injured peripheral neurons after axotomy and enables long-distance axon re-growth. Over 1000 genes are regulated, and many transcription factors are upregulated or activated as part of this response. However, a detailed picture of how RAG expression is regulated is lacking. In particular, the transcriptional targets and specific functions of the various transcription factors are unclear. Jun was the first-regeneration-associated transcription factor identified and the first shown to be functionally important. Here we fully define the role of Jun in the RAG expression program in regenerating facial motor neurons. At 1, 4 and 14 days after axotomy, Jun upregulates 11, 23 and 44% of the RAG program, respectively. Jun functions relevant to regeneration include cytoskeleton production, metabolic functions and cell activation, and the downregulation of neurotransmission machinery. In silico analysis of promoter regions of Jun targets identifies stronger over-representation of AP1-like sites than CRE-like sites, although CRE sites were also over-represented in regions flanking AP1 sites. Strikingly, in motor neurons lacking Jun, an alternative SRF-dependent gene expression program is initiated after axotomy. The promoters of these newly expressed genes exhibit over-representation of CRE sites in regions near to SRF target sites. This alternative gene expression program includes plasticity-associated transcription factors and leads to an aberrant early increase in synapse density on motor neurons. Jun thus has the important function in the early phase after axotomy of pushing the injured neuron away from a plasticity response and towards a regenerative phenotype.

Indexed as

AxonsNerve RegenerationAxotomyMotor NeuronsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junTranscription FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID34718572
PMCPMC9029231
OpenAlexW3211294320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.