Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34718571›Full record

ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2022

Graft flow assessment and early coronary artery bypass graft failure: a computed tomography analysis.

Andrea D'Alessio, Ioannis Akoumianakis, Andrew Kelion, Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios, Andrew Lucking, Sheena Thomas, Danilo Verdichizzo, Amar Keiralla, Charalambos Antoniades, George Krasopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Left main coronary artery disease treated with beating heart surgery: 10-year single center results.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea D'AlessioDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-0060
Ioannis AkoumianakisCardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4674-0210
Andrew KelionDepartment of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Dimitrios Terentes-PrintziosDepartment of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Andrew LuckingDepartment of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sheena ThomasCardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2097-465X
Danilo VerdichizzoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9473-2832
Amar KeirallaDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Charalambos AntoniadesCardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
George KrasopoulosDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9334-9604

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/F/21/90009British Heart Foundation RG/F/21/110040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe evaluated graft patency by computed tomography and explored the determinants of intraoperative mean graft flow (MGF) and its contribution to predict early graft occlusion.

methodsOne hundred and forty-eight patients under a single surgeon were prospectively enrolled. Arterial and endoscopically harvested venous conduits were used. Intraoperative graft characteristics and flows were collected. Graft patency was blindly evaluated by a follow-up computed tomography at 11.4 weeks (median).

resultsGraft occlusion rate was 5.2% (n = 22 of 422; 8% venous and 3% arterial). Thirteen were performed on non-significant proximal stenosis while 9 on occluded or >70% stenosed arteries. Arterial and venous graft MGF were lower in females (Parterial = 0.010, Pvenous = 0.009), with median differences of 10 and 13.5 ml/min, respectively. Arterial and venous MGF were associated positively with target vessel diameter ≥1.75 mm (Parterial = 0.025; Pvenous = 0.002) and negatively with pulsatility index (Parterial < 0.001; Pvenous < 0.001). MGF was an independent predictor of graft occlusion, adjusting for EuroSCORE-II, pulsatility index, graft size and graft type (arterial/venous). An MGF cut-off of 26.5 ml/min for arterial (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 80%) and 36.5 ml/min for venous grafts (sensitivity 75%, specificity 62%) performed well in predicting early graft occlusion.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that MGF absolute values are influenced by coronary size, gender and graft type. Intraoperative MGF of >26.5 ml/min for arterial and >36.5 ml/min for venous grafts is the most reliable independent predictor of early graft patency. Modern-era coronary artery bypass graft is associated with low early graft failure rates when transit time flow measurement is used to provide effective intraoperative quality assurance.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassTomography, X-Ray ComputedArteriesBlood Flow VelocityCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansVascular PatencyComputed tomography angiographyCoronary artery bypass graftEndoscopic vein harvestingGraft failureIntraoperative graft flowTransit time flow measurement

Identifiers

PMID34718571
PMCPMC9159422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.