Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34718172›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2022

A Gap in Care Leads to Progression of Fibrosis in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients.

Nicole C Chang, Kisan P Thakkar, Corey J Ketchem, Swathi Eluri, Craig C Reed, Evan S Dellon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Marked Improvement in Food Impaction Biopsy Rate (FIBR) After Implementation of a Multicenter Behavioral Intervention.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Variability in time to surveillance endoscopy for eosinophilic esophagitis remission and relation to treatment outcomes.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Review
  18. A clinical predictive model identifies pediatric patients at risk for eosinophilic esophagitis.Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and management.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole C ChangCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kisan P ThakkarCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Corey J KetchemCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Swathi EluriCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Craig C ReedCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
SHORT-TERM RESEARCH TRAININGT35DK007386 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Evan Samuel Dellon · 1986 to 2026
$4.1M
Approaches and Outcomes of Shared Decision-making and Patient Centered Care Delivery in Barrett's EsophagusK23DK131338 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Swathi Eluri · 2022 to 2026
$1000k
Epidemiologic Case-control Study of Barrett's EsophagusK23DK059311 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2001 to 2005
$626k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK059311NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK131338NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK007386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThere are few data assessing disease progression in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) after diagnosis. We aimed to determine outcomes and assess for progression of fibrosis in patients with EoE with a gap in their regular care.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with EoE, a "gap" in care was defined as ≥2 years without medical contact for EoE. For inclusion, a gap in care and both pre- and post-gap endoscopies were required. Patients with and without a gap were compared. Data were also compared in gap patients before the gap and after EoE care resumed, and progression of fibrosis and predictors were assessed.

resultsOf 701 patients with EoE, 95 (14%) had a gap in care (mean time without care, 4.8 ± 2.3 years). Post-gap, 12% presented with food impaction requiring emergency evaluation. Compared with pre-gap, patients post-gap had higher endoscopic severity (2.4 vs 1.5; P < .001) and smaller esophageal diameters (11.0 vs 12.7 mm; P = .04). Strictures were more prevalent with longer gap time (P < .05 for trend). Each additional year of gap time increased odds of stricture by 26%, even after accounting for pre-gap dilation. Additionally, of 67 patients without pre-gap fibrosis, 25 (37%) had at least one fibrotic feature (stricture, narrowing, or requiring dilation) post-gap.

conclusionsA gap in care of ≥2 years in patients with EoE was associated with signs of increased disease activity, and progression to fibrostenosis was noted, particularly with longer gaps in care. Because EoE can progress to fibrosis even after diagnosis, regular care in patients with EoE is required, perhaps at intervals <2 years.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisEsophageal StenosisConstriction, PathologicEnteritisEosinophiliaFibrosisGastritisHumansRetrospective StudiesDilationEosinophilic EsophagitisFibrosisNatural HistoryOutcomesStricture

Identifiers

PMID34718172
PMCPMC9043028
OpenAlexW3210265264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.