Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717597›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Developing best practices for PPE Portraits across 25 sites: a systematic assessment of implementation and spread of adaptations using FRAME.

Juliana Baratta, Alexis Amano, Paige K Parsons, Stacie Vilendrer, Shira G Winter, Mae-Richelle Verano, Cynthia Perez, Lucy Kalanithi, Steven M Asch, Mary Beth Heffernan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juliana BarattaStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Alexis AmanoStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Paige K ParsonsPaige K Parsons Photography, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Stacie VilendrerStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Shira G WinterStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Mae-Richelle VeranoStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Cynthia PerezStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Lucy KalanithiStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Steven M AschStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA.
Mary Beth HeffernanOccidental College Department of Art and Art History, 1600 Campus Rd, CA, 90041, Los Angeles, USA.
Cati Brown-JohnsonStanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health, 1265 Welch Rd, CA, 94305, Palo Alto, USA. catibj@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdaptation, a form of modification that aims to improve an intervention's acceptability and sustainability in each context, is essential to successful implementation in some settings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have rapidly adapted how they deliver patient care. PPE Portraits are a form of adaptation, whereby health workers affix a postcard size portrait of themselves to the front of their personal protective equipment (PPE) to foster human connection during COVID-19.

methodsWe used the expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (FRAME) method to better understand the reasoning behind and results of each adaptation. We hypothesized that using the FRAME in conjunction with design-thinking would lead to emerging best practices and that we would find adaptation similarities across sites. Throughout multiple implementations across 25 institutions, we piloted, tracked, and analyzed adaptations using FRAME and design thinking. For each adaptation, we assessed the stage of implementation, whether the change was planned, decision makers involved, level of delivery impacted, fidelity to original intervention, and the goal and reasoning for adaptation. We added three crucial components to the FRAME: original purpose of the adaptation, unintended consequences, and alternative adaptations.

resultsWhen implementing PPE Portraits across settings, from a local assisted living center's memory unit to a pediatric emergency department, several requests for adaptations arose during early development stages before implementation. Adaptations primarily related to (1) provider convenience and comfort, (2) patient populations, and (3) scale. Providers preferred smaller portraits and rounded (rather than square) laminated edges that could potentially injure a patient. Affixing the portrait with a magnet was rejected given the potential choking hazard the magnetic strip presented for children. Other adaptations, related to ease of dissemination, included slowing the process down during early development and providing buttons, which could be produced easily at scale.

conclusionsThe FRAME was used to curate the reasoning for each adaptation and to inform future dissemination. We look forward to utilizing FRAME including our additions and design thinking, to build out a range of PPE Portrait best practices with accompanying costs and benefits.

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal Protective EquipmentHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AdaptationsDesign thinkingFRAMEPPE Portraits

Identifiers

PMID34717597
PMCPMC8556769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.