Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717582›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Predicting response to immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using non-invasive Radiomic biomarkers.

Ying Zhu, Wang Yao, Bing-Chen Xu, Yi-Yan Lei, Qi-Kun Guo, Li-Zhi Liu, Hao-Jiang Li, Min Xu, Jing Yan, Dan-Dan Chang and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06579768 (Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions Based on Radiomics From Computed Tomography Images), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06579768 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions Based on Radiomics From Computed Tomography Images: A Multicenter, Prospective Machine Learning Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsJawbone Cysitc LesionArmsdifferent types of computed tomography (CT) scans
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ying Zhu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wang Yao *Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Bing-Chen Xu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yi-Yan LeiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qi-Kun GuoDepartment of Radiological Interventional, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Li-Zhi LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hao-Jiang LiDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Min XuScientific Collaboration, CT-MR Division, Canon Medical System (China), Jiuxianqiao North Road, Chaoyang District, 100015, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jing YanScientific Collaboration, CT-MR Division, Canon Medical System (China), Jiuxianqiao North Road, Chaoyang District, 100015, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Dan-Dan ChangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Shi-Ting FengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China. fengsht@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Zhi-Hua ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, People's Republic of China. zhuzhh@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a radiomics model for evaluating treatment response to immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy (ICI + CT) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

methodsA total of 64 patients with advance ESCC receiving first-line ICI + CT at two centers between January 2019 and June 2020 were enrolled in this study. Both 2D ROIs and 3D ROIs were segmented. ComBat correction was applied to minimize the potential bias on the results due to different scan protocols. A total of 788 features were extracted and radiomics models were built on corrected/uncorrected 2D and 3D features by using 5-fold cross-validation. The performance of the radiomics models was assessed by its discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness with independent validation.

resultsFive features and support vector machine algorithm were selected to build the 2D uncorrected, 2D corrected, 3D uncorrected and 3D corrected radiomics models. The 2D radiomics models significantly outperformed the 3D radiomics models in both primary and validation cohorts. When ComBat correction was used, the performance of 2D models was better (p = 0.0059) in the training cohort, and significantly better (p < 0.0001) in the validation cohort. The 2D corrected radiomics model yielded the optimal performance and was used to build the nomogram. The calibration curve of the radiomics model demonstrated good agreement between prediction and observation and the decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility.

conclusionsThe easy-to-use 2D corrected radiomics model could facilitate noninvasive preselection of ESCC patients who would benefit from ICI + CT.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiasBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinCombined Modality TherapyDocetaxelEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinDocetaxelImmune Checkpoint InhibitorssintilimabEsophageal cancerImmunotherapyRadiomicsTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID34717582
PMCPMC8557514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.