Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717571›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Effect of intra-partum Oxytocin on neonatal encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Constance Burgod, Stuti Pant, Maria Moreno Morales, Paolo Montaldo, Phoebe Ivain, Ramyia Elangovan, Paul Bassett, Sudhin Thayyil

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Constance BurgodCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK. c.burgod19@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7789-1003
Stuti PantCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Maria Moreno MoralesCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Paolo MontaldoCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Phoebe IvainCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Ramyia ElangovanCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Paul BassettStatsconsultancy Ltd., Amersham, London, England.
Sudhin ThayyilCentre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Imperial College London · GBAmerican Superconductor (Austria) · ATUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R001375/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxytocin is widely used for induction and augmentation of labour, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the effect of intra-partum Oxytocin use on neonatal encephalopathy.

methodsThe protocol for this study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020165049). We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science Core Collection databases for papers published between January 1970 and May 2021. We considered all studies involving term and near-term (≥36 weeks' gestation) primigravidae and multiparous women. We included all randomised, quasi-randomised clinical trials, retrospective studies and non-randomised prospective studies reporting intra-partum Oxytocin administration for induction and/or augmentation of labour. Our primary outcome was neonatal encephalopathy. Risk of bias was assessed in non-randomised studies using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The RoB 2.0 tool was used for randomised studies. A Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects analysis model were used for meta-analysis. Odds ratios were used to determine effect measure and reported with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsWe included data from seven studies (6 Case-control studies, 1 cluster-randomised trial) of which 3 took place in high-income countries (HICs) and 4 in LMICs. The pooled data included a total of 24,208 women giving birth at or after 36 weeks; 7642 had intra-partum Oxytocin for induction and/or augmentation of labour, and 16,566 did not receive intra-partum Oxytocin. Oxytocin use was associated with an increased prevalence of neonatal encephalopathy (Odds Ratio 2.19, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.04; p < 0.00001).

conclusionsIntra-partum Oxytocin may increase the risk of neonatal encephalopathy. Future clinical trials of uterotonics should include neonatal encephalopathy as a key outcome.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricBiasBrain DiseasesCase-Control StudiesDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesOdds RatioOxytocicsOxytocinPregnancyOxytocicsOxytocinAugmentationHigh-income countriesInductionLabourLow- and middle-income countriesNeonatal encephalopathyOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID34717571
PMCPMC8556930
OpenAlexW3208208769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.