Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717540›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

LongStitch: high-quality genome assembly correction and scaffolding using long reads.

Lauren Coombe, Janet X Li, Theodora Lo, Johnathan Wong, Vladimir Nikolic, René L Warren, Inanc Birol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of genomics · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren Coombe *Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada. lcoombe@bcgsc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-2326
Janet X Li *Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.
Theodora Lo *Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.
Johnathan WongCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.
Vladimir NikolicCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.
René L WarrenCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.
Inanc BirolCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.

Funding

De Novo Assembly Tools: Research with Unbiased Engines - Renewal (DNA-TRUER)R01HG007182 · NHGRI · PROVINCIAL HEALTH SERVICES AUTHORITY · PI BIROL, INANC · 2014 to 2022
$1.9M
genome british columbia 243FORgenome british columbia 281ANVgenome canada 243FORgenome canada 281ANVNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007182NIH HHS 2R01HG007182-04A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenerating high-quality de novo genome assemblies is foundational to the genomics study of model and non-model organisms. In recent years, long-read sequencing has greatly benefited genome assembly and scaffolding, a process by which assembled sequences are ordered and oriented through the use of long-range information. Long reads are better able to span repetitive genomic regions compared to short reads, and thus have tremendous utility for resolving problematic regions and helping generate more complete draft assemblies. Here, we present LongStitch, a scalable pipeline that corrects and scaffolds draft genome assemblies exclusively using long reads.

resultsLongStitch incorporates multiple tools developed by our group and runs in up to three stages, which includes initial assembly correction (Tigmint-long), followed by two incremental scaffolding stages (ntLink and ARKS-long). Tigmint-long and ARKS-long are misassembly correction and scaffolding utilities, respectively, previously developed for linked reads, that we adapted for long reads. Here, we describe the LongStitch pipeline and introduce our new long-read scaffolder, ntLink, which utilizes lightweight minimizer mappings to join contigs. LongStitch was tested on short and long-read assemblies of Caenorhabditis elegans, Oryza sativa, and three different human individuals using corresponding nanopore long-read data, and improves the contiguity of each assembly from 1.2-fold up to 304.6-fold (as measured by NGA50 length). Furthermore, LongStitch generates more contiguous and correct assemblies compared to state-of-the-art long-read scaffolder LRScaf in most tests, and consistently improves upon human assemblies in under five hours using less than 23 GB of RAM.

conclusionsDue to its effectiveness and efficiency in improving draft assemblies using long reads, we expect LongStitch to benefit a wide variety of de novo genome assembly projects. The LongStitch pipeline is freely available at https://github.com/bcgsc/longstitch .

Indexed as

GenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingGenomeHumansRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNADe novo genome assemblyGenome scaffoldingLong readsMinimizersMisassembly correction

Identifiers

PMID34717540
PMCPMC8557608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.