Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717498›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble.

Vibha Viswanathan, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Michael G Heinz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prediction from Statistical Learning Aids Auditory Scene Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Individual differences elucidate the perceptual benefits associated with robust temporal fine-structure processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Speech Categorization Reveals the Role of Early-Stage Temporal-Coherence Processing in Auditory Scene Analysis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vibha ViswanathanWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Barbara G Shinn-CunninghamNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Michael G HeinzDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.

Funding

Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Robust Speech CodingR01DC009838 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael G Heinz · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Physiological Signatures and Behavioral Correlates of Hidden Hearing LossR01DC015988 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAMACHANDRAN, RAMNARAYAN, SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Individual differences in supra-threshold sound encodingR01DC013825 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Speech Intelligibility in Noise - A Quantitative FrameworkF31DC017381 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI VISWANATHAN, VIBHA · 2018 to 2020
$134k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC017381NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009838NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013825NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the mechanisms of speech perception in everyday listening environments, it is important to elucidate the relative contributions of different acoustic cues in transmitting phonetic content. Previous studies suggest that the envelope of speech in different frequency bands conveys most speech content, while the temporal fine structure (TFS) can aid in segregating target speech from background noise. However, the role of TFS in conveying phonetic content beyond what envelopes convey for intact speech in complex acoustic scenes is poorly understood. The present study addressed this question using online psychophysical experiments to measure the identification of consonants in multi-talker babble for intelligibility-matched intact and 64-channel envelope-vocoded stimuli. Consonant confusion patterns revealed that listeners had a greater tendency in the vocoded (versus intact) condition to be biased toward reporting that they heard an unvoiced consonant, despite envelope and place cues being largely preserved. This result was replicated when babble instances were varied across independent experiments, suggesting that TFS conveys voicing information beyond what is conveyed by envelopes for intact speech in babble. Given that multi-talker babble is a masker that is ubiquitous in everyday environments, this finding has implications for the design of assistive listening devices such as cochlear implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationNoisePerceptual MaskingPhoneticsSpeechSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID34717498
PMCPMC8514254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.