ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021
Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal integration in the subcortical auditory system and behavioral evidence of its dysfunction after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Physiological, Histological, and Cognitive Characterization of a Rhesus Macaque Model of Presbycusis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Persistent impairment of spatial hearing and neural binaural interaction after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hierarchical differences in the encoding of amplitude modulation in the subcortical auditory system of awake nonhuman primates.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Spectral-temporal processing of naturalistic sounds in monkeys and humans.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Audiologic characterization using clinical physiological measures: Normative data from macaque monkeys.Hearing research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between sound duration and detection threshold has long been thought to reflect temporal integration. Reports of species differences in this relationship are equivocal: some meta-analyses report no species differences, whereas others report substantial differences, particularly between humans and their close phylogenetic relatives, macaques. This renders translational work in macaques problematic. To reevaluate this difference, tone detection performance was measured in macaques using a go/no-go reaction time (RT) task at various tone durations and in the presence of broadband noise (BBN). Detection thresholds, RTs, and the dynamic range (DR) of the psychometric function decreased as the tone duration increased. The threshold by duration trends suggest macaques integrate at a similar rate to humans. The RT trends also resemble human data and are the first reported in animals. Whereas the BBN did not affect how the threshold or RT changed with the duration, it substantially reduced the DR at short durations. A probabilistic Poisson model replicated the effects of duration on threshold and DR and required integration from multiple simulated auditory nerve fibers to explain the performance at shorter durations. These data suggest that, contrary to previous studies, macaques are uniquely well-suited to model human temporal integration and form the baseline for future neurophysiological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.