Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717459›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Elin Roverud, Judy R Dubno, Virginia M Richards, Gerald Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elin RoverudDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5500, USA.
Virginia M RichardsDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, 2201 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-5100, USA.
Gerald KiddDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

Funding

CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY MASKINGR01DC004545 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2000 to 2021
$9.0M
Weighting of auditory informationK01DC016627 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI ROVERUD, ELIN · 2018 to 2020
$394k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC016627NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies of level discrimination reported that listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) place greater weight on high frequencies than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. It is not clear whether these results are influenced by stimulus factors (e.g., group differences in presentation levels, cross-frequency discriminability of level differences used to measure weights) and whether such weights generalize to other tasks. Here, NH and SNHL weights were measured for level, duration, and frequency discrimination of two-tone complexes after measuring discriminability just-noticeable differences for each frequency and stimulus dimension. Stimuli were presented at equal sensation level (SL) or equal sound pressure level (SPL). Results showed that weights could change depending on which frequency contained the more discriminable level difference with uncontrolled cross-frequency discriminability. When cross-frequency discriminability was controlled, weights were consistent for level and duration discrimination, but not for frequency discrimination. Comparing equal SL and equal SPL weights indicated greater weight on the higher-level tone for level and duration discrimination. Weights were unrelated to improvements in recognition of low-pass-filtered speech with increasing cutoff frequency. These results suggest that cross-frequency weights and NH and SNHL weighting differences are influenced by stimulus factors and may not generalize to the use of speech cues in specific frequency regions.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCuesHearingHumansSpeech

Identifiers

PMID34717459
PMCPMC8637742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.