Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717330›Full record

ArticleChaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)2021

Dynamical ergodicity DDA reveals causal structure in time series.

Claudia Lainscsek, Sydney S Cash, Terrence J Sejnowski, Jürgen Kurths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decoding imagined speech with delay differential analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia LainscsekComputational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.ORCID 0000000210678961
Sydney S CashDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Terrence J SejnowskiComputational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Jürgen KurthsPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam 14473, Germany.ORCID 0000000259264276

Funding

Multiscale modeling and large-scale recordings of trauma-induced epileptogenesisR01NS104368 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Nonlinear Causal Analysis of Neural SignalsR01EB026899 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 2018 to 2020
$1.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026899NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining synchronization, causality, and dynamical similarity in highly complex nonlinear systems like brains is challenging. Although distinct, these measures are related by the unknown deterministic structure of the underlying dynamical system. For two systems that are not independent on each other, either because they result from a common process or they are already synchronized, causality measures typically fail. Here, we introduce dynamical ergodicity to assess dynamical similarity between time series and then combine this new measure with cross-dynamical delay differential analysis to estimate causal interactions between time series. We first tested this approach on simulated data from coupled Rössler systems where ground truth was known. We then applied it to intracranial electroencephalographic data from patients with epilepsy and found distinct dynamical states that were highly predictive of epileptic seizures.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEpilepsyBrainHumansNonlinear Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID34717330
PMCPMC12640249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.