ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2021
Disruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex.
Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of somatosensation by transcranial magnetic stimulation over somatosensory cortex: a systematic review.Experimental brain research · 2023Pooled it
- Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Embodied Speech: Sensorimotor Contributions to Native and Non-Native Phoneme Processing and Learning.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Review
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates the tactile acuity of the tongue.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- The Effects of Theta-Gamma Peak Stimulation on Sensorimotor Learning During Speech Production.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile acuity of tongue.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Test-Retest Reliability of Behavioral Assays of Feedforward and Feedback Auditory-Motor Control of Voice and Articulation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
When auditory feedback perturbation is introduced in a predictable way over a number of utterances, speakers learn to compensate by adjusting their own productions, a process known as sensorimotor adaptation. Despite multiple lines of evidence indicating the role of primary motor cortex (M1) in motor learning and memory, whether M1 causally contributes to sensorimotor adaptation in the speech domain remains unclear. Here, we aimed to assay whether temporary disruption of the articulatory representation in left M1 by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) impairs speech adaptation. To induce sensorimotor adaptation, the frequencies of first formants (F1) were shifted up and played back to participants when they produced "head", "bed", and "dead" repeatedly (the learning phase). A low-frequency rTMS train (.6 Hz, subthreshold, 12 min) over either the tongue or the hand representation of M1 (between-subjects design) was applied before participants experienced altered auditory feedback in the learning phase. We found that the group who received rTMS over the hand representation showed the expected compensatory response for the upwards shift in F1 by significantly reducing F1 and increasing the second formant (F2) frequencies in their productions. In contrast, these expected compensatory changes in both F1 and F2 did not occur in the group that received rTMS over the tongue representation. Critically, rTMS (subthreshold) over the tongue representation did not affect vowel production, which was unchanged from baseline. These results provide direct evidence that the articulatory representation in left M1 causally contributes to sensorimotor learning in speech. Furthermore, these results also suggest that M1 is critical to the network supporting a more global adaptation that aims to move the altered speech production closer to a learnt pattern of speech production used to produce another vowel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.