ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021
Cerebral aneurysm flow diverter modeled as a thin inhomogeneous porous medium in hemodynamic simulations.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Computationally Efficient CFD Method for Blood Flow Analysis Following Flow Diverter Stent Deployment and Its Application to Treatment Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic differences of posterior communicating artery aneurysms between adult and fetal types of posterior cerebral artery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Fluid dynamics in intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: effect of multiple geometrical parameters.Journal of fluid mechanics · 2023Article
- Numerical Study of a Thrombus Migration Risk in Aneurysm After Coil Embolization in Patient Cases: FSI Modelling.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Influence of stent-induced vessel deformation on hemodynamic feature of bloodstream inside ICA aneurysms.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
- Influence of the coiling porosity on the risk reduction of the cerebral aneurysm rupture: computational study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Realistic computer modelling of stent retriever thrombectomy: a hybrid finite-element analysis-smoothed particle hydrodynamics model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and accurate simulation of cerebral aneurysm flow modifications by flow diverters (FDs) can help improving patient-specific intervention and predicting treatment outcome. However, when FD devices are explicitly represented in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, flow around the stent wires must be resolved, leading to high computational cost. Classic porous medium (PM) methods can reduce computational expense but cannot capture the inhomogeneous FD wire distribution once implanted on a cerebral artery and thus cannot accurately model the post-stenting aneurysmal flow. We report a novel approach that models the FD flow modification as a thin inhomogeneous porous medium (iPM). It improves over the classic PM approaches in two ways. First, the FD is more appropriately treated as a thin screen, which is more accurate than the classic 3D-PM-based Darcy-Forchheimer relation. Second, pressure drop is calculated cell-by-cell using the local FD geometric parameters across an inhomogeneous PM. We applied the iPM technique to simulating the post-stenting hemodynamics of three patient-specific aneurysms. To test its accuracy and speed, we compared the results from the iPM technique against CFD simulations with explicit FD devices. The iPM CFD ran 500% faster than the explicit CFD while achieving 94%-99% accuracy; thus, iPM is a promising clinical bedside modeling tool to assist endovascular interventions with FD and stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.