Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34717024›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2022

StomataScorer: a portable and high-throughput leaf stomata trait scorer combined with deep learning and an improved CV model.

Xiuying Liang, Xichen Xu, Zhiwei Wang, Lei He, Kaiqi Zhang, Bo Liang, Junli Ye, Jiawei Shi, Xi Wu, Mingqiu Dai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiuying LiangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xichen XuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Zhiwei WangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Lei HeNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Kaiqi ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Bo LiangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Junli YeNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Jiawei ShiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xi WuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Mingqiu DaiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Wanneng YangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1095-1355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To measure stomatal traits automatically and nondestructively, a new method for detecting stomata and extracting stomatal traits was proposed. Two portable microscopes with different resolutions (TipScope with a 40× lens attached to a smartphone and ProScope HR2 with a 400× lens) are used to acquire images of living stomata in maize leaves. FPN model was used to detect stomata in the TipScope images and measure the stomata number and stomatal density. Faster RCNN model was used to detect opening and closing stomata in the ProScope HR2 images, and the number of opening and closing stomata was measured. An improved CV model was used to segment pores of opening stomata, and a total of 6 pore traits were measured. Compared to manual measurements, the square of the correlation coefficient (R

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlant StomataDroughtsPhenotypePlant Leavesdeep learningimproved CV modelliving stomatapore segmentationpore traitsstomata detectionstomatal density

Identifiers

PMID34717024
PMCPMC8882810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.