Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716900›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2021

Harnessing nanomedicine for enhanced immunotherapy for breast cancer brain metastases.

Christine P Carney, Nikhil Pandey, Anshika Kapur, Graeme F Woodworth, Jeffrey A Winkles, Anthony J Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Overcoming transport barrier to immunotherapies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine P CarneyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3402-0603
Nikhil PandeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-6893
Anshika KapurDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-5171
Graeme F WoodworthDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-0768
Jeffrey A WinklesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. jwinkles@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-1424
Anthony J KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. akim@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8733-6046

Funding

Impact of Fn14-targeted Nanoparticles for Triple-Negative Breast CancerR37CA218617 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KIM, ANTHONY J. · 2018 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA218617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common type of brain tumor, and the incidence among breast cancer (BC) patients has been steadily increasing over the past two decades. Indeed, ~ 30% of all patients with metastatic BC will develop BMs, and due to few effective treatments, many will succumb to the disease within a year. Historically, patients with BMs have been largely excluded from clinical trials investigating systemic therapies including immunotherapies (ITs) due to limited brain penetration of systemically administered drugs combined with previous assumptions that BMs are poorly immunogenic. It is now understood that the central nervous system (CNS) is an immunologically distinct site and there is increasing evidence that enhancing immune responses to BCBMs will improve patient outcomes and the efficacy of current treatment regimens. Progress in IT for BCBMs, however, has been slow due to several intrinsic limitations to drug delivery within the brain, substantial safety concerns, and few known targets for BCBM IT. Emerging studies demonstrate that nanomedicine may be a powerful approach to overcome such limitations, and has the potential to greatly improve IT strategies for BMs specifically. This review summarizes the evidence for IT as an effective strategy for BCBM treatment and focuses on the nanotherapeutic strategies currently being explored for BCBMs including targeting the blood-brain/tumor barrier (BBB/BTB), tumor cells, and tumor-supporting immune cells for concentrated drug release within BCBMs, as well as use of nanoparticles (NPs) for delivering immunomodulatory agents, for inducing immunogenic cell death, or for potentiating anti-tumor T cell responses.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsNanoparticlesFemaleHumansImmunotherapyNanomedicineBlood–brain barrierBreast cancer brain metastasesImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyNanoimmunotherapiesNanoparticlesNanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID34716900
PMCPMC8568876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.