Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716846›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2022

Biomarkers of DNA Damage Response Enable Flow Cytometry-Based Diagnostic to Identify Inborn DNA Repair Defects in Primary Immunodeficiencies.

Kerstin Felgentreff, Ulrich Baumann, Christian Klemann, Catharina Schuetz, Dorothee Viemann, Martin Wetzke, Ulrich Pannicke, Sandra von Hardenberg, Bernd Auber, Klaus-Michael Debatin and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Deciphering the aging process through single-cell cytometric technologies.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kerstin FelgentreffDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany. kerstin.felgentreff@uniklinik-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-0362
Ulrich BaumannDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian KlemannDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Catharina SchuetzDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Dorothee ViemannDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Martin WetzkeDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ulrich PannickeInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Sandra von HardenbergDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Bernd AuberDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Klaus-Michael DebatinDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Eva-Maria JacobsenDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Manfred HoenigDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Ansgar SchulzDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Klaus SchwarzInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEGerman Red Cross · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage is a constant event in every cell caused by exogenous factors such as ultraviolet and ionizing radiation (UVR/IR) and intercalating drugs, or endogenous metabolic and replicative stress. Proteins of the DNA damage response (DDR) network sense DNA lesions and induce cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis. Genetic defects of DDR or DNA repair proteins can be associated with immunodeficiency, bone marrow failure syndromes, and cancer susceptibility. Although various diagnostic tools are available to evaluate DNA damage, their quality to identify DNA repair deficiencies differs enormously and depends on affected pathways. In this study, we investigated the DDR biomarkers γH2AX (Ser139), p-ATM (Ser1981), and p-CHK2 (Thr68) using flow cytometry on peripheral blood cells obtained from patients with combined immunodeficiencies due to non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) defects and ataxia telangiectasia (AT) in response to low-dose IR. Significantly reduced induction of all three markers was observed in AT patients compared to controls. However, delayed downregulation of γH2AX was found in patients with NHEJ defects. In contrast to previous reports of DDR in cellular models, these biomarkers were not sensitive enough to identify ARTEMIS deficiency with sufficient reliability. In summary, DDR biomarkers are suitable for diagnosing NHEJ defects and AT, which can be useful in neonates with abnormal TREC levels (T cell receptor excision circles) identified by newborn screening. We conclude that DDR biomarkers have benefits and some limitations depending on the underlying DNA repair deficiency.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairBiomarkersFlow CytometryHumansReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersCancer susceptibilityDNA damage responseDNA repairImmunodeficiencyRadiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID34716846
PMCPMC8821069
OpenAlexW3209983607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.