Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716822›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Comparison of manual versus automated measurement of Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis based on a deep learning keypoint detection technology.

Yu Sun, Yaozhong Xing, Zian Zhao, Xianglong Meng, Gang Xu, Yong Hai

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05392504 (Effects of Core Stabilization Exercises Versus Schroth's Program on Posture and Quality of Life in Females With Idiopathic Scoliosis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05392504 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Core Stabilization Exercises Versus Schroth's Program on Posture and Quality of Life in Females With Idiopathic Scoliosis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsScoliosis IdiopathicArmsCore stability exercise, Scroth's Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Posture-dependent assessment of whole-spine curvature with a rotatable cryogen-free 1.5T MRI and automated Cobb angle analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A novel artificial Intelligence-Based model for automated Lenke classification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Deep learning algorithm for automatically measuring Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Review
  18. Repeatability and intra and interrater reproducibility of the DIPA-S eHealth© capture and analysis system for clinical assessment of scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu Sun *School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yaozhong Xing *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gong Ti Nan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Zian Zhao *School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xianglong Meng *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gong Ti Nan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China. spinesurgeonmeng@ccmu.edu.cn.
Gang XuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gong Ti Nan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yong HaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gong Ti Nan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study compared manual and automated measurement of Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis based on deep learning keypoint detection technology.

methodsA total of 181 anterior-posterior spinal X-rays were included in this study, including 165 cases of idiopathic scoliosis and 16 normal adult cases without scoliosis. We labeled all images and randomly chose 145 as the training set and 36 as the test set. Two state-of-the-art deep learning object detection models based on convolutional neural networks were used in sequence to segment each vertebra and locate the vertebral corners. Cobb angles measured from the output of the models were compared to manual measurements performed by orthopedic experts.

resultsThe mean Cobb angle in test cases was 27.4° ± 19.2° (range 0.00-91.00°) with manual measurements and 26.4° ± 18.9° (range 0.00-88.00°) with automated measurements. The automated method needed 4.45 s on average to measure each radiograph. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the reliability of the automated measurement of the Cobb angle was 0.994. The Pearson correlation coefficient and mean absolute error between automated positioning and expert annotation were 0.990 and 2.2° ± 2.0°, respectively. The analytical result for the Spearman rank-order correlation was 0.984 (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe automated measurement results agreed with the experts' annotation and had a high degree of reliability when the Cobb angle did not exceed 90° and could locate multiple curves in the same scoliosis case simultaneously in a short period of time. Our results need to be verified in more cases in the future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningScoliosisAdultHumansReproducibility of ResultsSpineTechnologyAutomated measuringCobb angleDeep learningIdiopathic scoliosisKeypoint detection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.