Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716753›Full record

Trial reportESC heart failure2021

Efficacy and safety of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure patients: the LAICA study.

Martín J García-González, Ana Aldea Perona, Antonio Lara Padron, José Luis Morales Rull, Manuel Martínez-Sellés, Manuel de Mora Martin, Javier López Díaz, Silvia López Fernandez, Pilar Ortiz Oficialdegui, Alejandro Jiménez Sosa

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: The LEVOCEST trial.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Low-dose levosimendan infusions in advanced heart failure: efficacy, safety, and factors associated with outcomes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Martín J García-GonzálezAcute Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra. La Cuesta-Taco, Ofra s/n, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Ana Aldea PeronaInstitut Municipal d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Lara PadronAcute Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ctra. La Cuesta-Taco, Ofra s/n, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
José Luis Morales RullHeart Failure Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Institut de Recerca Biomédica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain.
Manuel Martínez-SellésDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, CIBERCV, Universidad Europea, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel de Mora MartinDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Regional Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain.
Javier López DíazDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, CIBERCV, Valladolid, Spain.
Silvia López FernandezHeart Failure Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Pilar Ortiz OficialdeguiDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain.
Alejandro Jiménez SosaClinical Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Canarias · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESHospital Sierrallana · ESHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of the LAICA study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of intermittent levosimendan infusion in patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF). METHODS AND

resultsThis was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of intermittent levosimendan 0.1 μg/kg/min as a continuous 24-h intravenous infusion administered once monthly for 1 year in patients with AdHF. The primary endpoint [incidence of rehospitalization (admission to the emergency department or hospital ward for >12 h) for acute decompensated HF or clinical deterioration of the underlying HF] occurred in 23/70 (33%) of the levosimendan group (Group I) and 12/27 (44%) of the placebo group (Group II) (P = 0.286). The incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF (Group I vs. Group II) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 4.2% vs. 18.2% (P = 0.036); 12.8% vs. 33.3% (P = 0.02); 25.7% vs. 40.7% (P = 0.147); 32.8% vs. 44.4% (P = 0.28), respectively. In a secondary pre-specified time-to-event analysis no differences were observed in admission for acute decompensated HF between patients treated with levosimendan compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.32-1.32; P = 0.24). Cumulative incidence for the aggregated endpoint of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 months were significatively lower in the levosimendan group than in placebo group [5.7% vs. 25.9% (P = 0.004) and 17.1% vs. 48.1% (P = 0.001), respectively], but not at 6 and 12 months [34.2% vs. 59.2% (P = 0.025); 41.4% vs. 66.6% (P = 0.022), respectively]. Survival probability was significantly higher in patients who received levosimendan compared with those who received placebo (log rank: 4.06; P = 0.044). There were no clinically relevant differences in tolerability between levosimendan and placebo and no new safety signals were observed.

conclusionsIn our study, intermittent levosimendan in patients with AdHF produced a statistically non-significant reduction in the incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF, a significantly lower cumulative incidence of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 month of treatment and a significant improvement in survival during 12 months of treatment.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePyridazinesCardiotonic AgentsHumansHydrazonesSimendanCardiotonic AgentsHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendanAdvanced heart failureInodilatorIntermittent administrationLevosimendanRehospitalization

Identifiers

PMID34716753
PMCPMC8712777
OpenAlexW3210625197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.