Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716697›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2021

Interest of exome sequencing trio-like strategy based on pooled parental DNA for diagnosis and translational research in rare diseases.

Frederic Tran Mau-Them, Yannis Duffourd, Antonio Vitobello, Ange-Line Bruel, Anne-Sophie Denommé-Pichon, Sophie Nambot, Julian Delanne, Sebastien Moutton, Arthur Sorlin, Orphanomix Physician’s Group and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frederic Tran Mau-ThemUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Yannis DuffourdInserm - Université de Bourgogne UMR1231 GAD, FHU-TRANSLAD, Dijon, France.
Antonio VitobelloUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Ange-Line BruelUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0526-465X
Anne-Sophie Denommé-PichonUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Sophie NambotCentre de Référence Maladies Rares « Anomalies du Développement et Syndrome Malformatifs » de l'Est, Hôpital d'Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Julian DelanneCentre de Référence Maladies Rares « Anomalies du Développement et Syndrome Malformatifs » de l'Est, Hôpital d'Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Sebastien MouttonCentre de Référence Maladies Rares « Anomalies du Développement et Syndrome Malformatifs » de l'Est, Hôpital d'Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Arthur SorlinCentre de Référence Maladies Rares « Anomalies du Développement et Syndrome Malformatifs » de l'Est, Hôpital d'Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Orphanomix Physician’s GroupFHU-TRANSLAD, Dijon, France.
Victor CouturierUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Valentin BourgeoisUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Martin ChevarinUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Charlotte PoeUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Anne-Laure Mosca-BoidronLaboratoire de Génétique Chromosomique et Moléculaire, CHU de Dijon, France.
Patrick CallierLaboratoire de Génétique Chromosomique et Moléculaire, CHU de Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-1848
Hana SafraouUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Laurence FaivreInserm - Université de Bourgogne UMR1231 GAD, FHU-TRANSLAD, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9770-444X
Christophe PhilippeUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Christel Thauvin-RobinetUnité Fonctionnelle 6254 d'Innovation en Diagnostique Génomique des Maladies Rares, Pôle de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Inserm · FRHôpital d'Enfants · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExome sequencing (ES) has become the most powerful and cost-effective molecular tool for deciphering rare diseases with a diagnostic yield approaching 30%-40% in solo-ES and 50% in trio-ES. We applied an innovative parental DNA pooling method to reduce the parental sequencing cost while maintaining the diagnostic yield of trio-ES.

methodsWe pooled six (Agilent-CRE-v2-100X) or five parental DNA (TWIST-HCE-70X) aiming to detect allelic balance around 8-10% for heterozygous status. The strategies were applied as second-tier (74 individuals after negative solo-ES) and first-tier approaches (324 individuals without previous ES).

resultsThe allelic balance of parental-pool variants was around 8.97%. Sanger sequencing uncovered false positives in 1.5% of sporadic variants. In the second-tier approach, we evaluated than two thirds of the Sanger validations performed after solo-ES (41/59-69%) would have been saved if the parental-pool segregations had been available from the start. The parental-pool strategy identified a causative diagnosis in 18/74 individuals (24%) in the second-tier and in 116/324 individuals (36%) in the first-tier approaches, including 19 genes newly associated with human disorders.

conclusionsParental-pooling is an efficient alternative to trio-ES. It provides rapid segregation and extension to translational research while reducing the cost of parental and Sanger sequencing.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingTranslational Research, BiomedicalGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansRare DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowGenetic Markerscost effectivenessexome sequencingrare diseasestrio-like strategy; parental-pool strategy

Identifiers

PMID34716697
PMCPMC8683640
OpenAlexW3210204209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.