Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716590›Full record

Observational studyInternational nursing review2022

Evaluating Polish nurses' working conditions and patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Iwona Malinowska-Lipień, Tadeusz Wadas, Teresa Gabryś, Maria Kózka, Agnieszka Gniadek, Tomasz Brzostek, Allison Squires

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International nursing review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Iwona Malinowska-LipieńFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-3406
Tadeusz WadasMałopolska District Chamber of Nurses and Midwives in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.
Teresa GabryśFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1976-6765
Maria KózkaFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5165-6929
Agnieszka GniadekFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4179-6730
Tomasz BrzostekFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6838-2090
Allison SquiresRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2122
Jagiellonian University · PLNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the relationship between Polish nurses' working conditions and their attitudes towards patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

backgroundFacing the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, healthcare worldwide has been reorganised. How these changes affected patient safety for hospitalised persons is not well understood.

introductionDifficult working conditions related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic may affect the provision of safe and effective care by healthcare staff.

methodsThis observational research was performed on the group of 577 nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic in isolation infection wards (n = 201) and non-infectious diseases wards (n = 376) in Polish hospitals. The evaluation of working conditions was performed with an author's questionnaire, while the evaluation of factors influencing attitudes towards safety of the hospitalised patients was performed using Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. The STROBE checklist was used to report this study.

resultsThe procedures developed by management in advance for COVID-19 patient treatment had a statistically significant influence on nurses' 'evaluation of teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, perception of management and work conditions'. Providing management with the ability to perform a swab polymerase chain reaction SARS-CoV-2 test for hospital staff in the workplace, and psychological support from professionals and employers were statistically significant for higher ratings of 'teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perception of management and work conditions' by the Polish nurses. Hospital workload during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly correlated with lower evaluation of work conditions. DISCUSSION: Our study reinforces the existing literature on many fronts and demonstrates how even when operating under the COVID-19 pandemic conditions, some factors remain critical for fostering a culture of patient safety. Reinforcing patient safety practices is a imperative under these conditions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Working conditions influence nurses' attitudes towards safety of the hospitalised patients. These are largely modifiable factors related to the workplace and include prior preparation of procedures, restrictions to extending daily work hours and psychological counselling for the staff.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesNursing Staff, HospitalHumansJob SatisfactionPandemicsPatient SafetyPolandSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesattitudes to safetyCOVID-19nursespatient safetywork conditions

Identifiers

PMID34716590
PMCPMC8653238
OpenAlexW3209445622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.