Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716487›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2022

Quantitative and qualitative analyses of urinary L-FABP for predicting acute kidney injury after emergency laparotomy.

Hirotaka Okuda, Yumi Obata, Atsuko Kamijo-Ikemori, Soichiro Inoue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirotaka OkudaDepartment of Anesthesiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan.
Yumi ObataDepartment of Anesthesiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan.
Atsuko Kamijo-IkemoriDepartment of Anatomy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Soichiro InoueDepartment of Anesthesiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan. inoues@marianna-u.ac.jp.
St. Marianna University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to explore the clinical utility of urinary L-FABP for earlier prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after emergency laparotomy, and to assess the clinical utility of a point-of-care (POC) kit for urinary L-FABP.

methodsForty-eight patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were divided into AKI and non-AKI groups by the kidney diseases: improving global outcome (KDIGO) criteria. Ten patients were included in the AKI group. Urinary L-FABP, albumin, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), TIMP-2, IGFBP7, serum creatinine (SCr), and blood presepsin were measured perioperatively and compared between groups. Perioperative urinary L-FABP was also evaluated qualitatively using a POC kit.

resultsL-FABP and albumin levels were significantly higher in the AKI group at all measurement points. NAG was significantly higher only postoperatively in the AKI group. There were no inter-group differences in [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] at any measuring point. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of urinary L-FABP was greater than 0.8 perioperatively, which was larger than that of other biomarkers throughout the study period. The correlation coefficient at 2 h after entering the operating room between quantitative and qualitative tests for urinary L-FABP was 0.714, which was the maximum. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the urinary L-FABP POC kit at 2 h after entry were 55.6%, 91.9%, and 89.5%, respectively.

conclusionQuantitative L-FABP analyses is suitable for predicting postoperative AKI earlier in the perioperative period of emergency laparotomy. Conversely, the higher specificity of qualitative L-FABP analysis suggests that it may be useful for excluding the risk of AKI but its overall clinical validity should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryLaparotomyBiomarkersCreatinineHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsPeptide FragmentsPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveBiomarkersCreatinineLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsPeptide Fragmentspresepsin protein, humanAcute kidney injuryEmergency laparotomyIGFBP7TIMP-2Urinary L-FABP

Identifiers

PMID34716487
OpenAlexW3210572867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.