Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716481›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Safety and effectiveness of sling fiber preservation POEM to reduce severe post-procedural erosive esophagitis.

Hironari Shiwaku, Haruhiro Inoue, Akio Shiwaku, Hiroki Okada, Suguru Hasegawa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07178821 (Sling-Fiber Preservation POEM vs. Conventional POEM for Reducing Post-POEM GERD), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07178821 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Sling-Fiber Preservation POEM vs. Conventional POEM for Reducing Post-POEM GERD: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2025 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsAchalasia, Esophageal, GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)ArmsConventional POEM, Sling Fiber-Preserving POEM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hironari ShiwakuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jyounan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. hiro.shiwaku@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8435-3668
Haruhiro InoueDigestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto-Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akio ShiwakuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jyounan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Hiroki OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jyounan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Suguru HasegawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jyounan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Fukuoka University · JPShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is standard treatment for achalasia. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after POEM has been an important challenge since the early days of POEM implementation. The esophagogastric junction anti-reflux barrier consists of internal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (i.e., intrinsic muscles of distal esophagus with sling fibers) and external LES (crural diaphragm and phrenoesophageal ligament anchors the distal esophagus to the crural diaphragm). During conventional POEM, the entire internal LES is unintentionally dissected. Preservation of the sling fiber may reduce post-POEM GERD, but its safety and effectiveness have been unclear. In this study, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of sling fiber preservation POEM (SP-POEM) for reducing severe post-procedural erosive esophagitis.

methodsWe analyzed data of 236 patients who underwent POEM; of these, 203 patients underwent posterior myotomy without (Group 1) or with attempted (Group 2) sling fiber preservation. Group 1 (N = 79; sling fiber excision, N = 68) and Group 2 (N = 90; sling fiber preservation, N = 81) were compared. Post-procedural erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles classification) were assessed and the area (direction and length) of mucosal break was also investigated. The gastroesophageal flap valve was evaluated by Hill's classification.

resultsSevere erosive esophagitis exceeding grade C (Los Angeles classification) occurred in 44.1% of patients (30/68) in Group 1 and in 18.5% of patients (15/81) in Group 2. In mapping of erosive esophagitis, mucosal breaks appeared widely in all directions in Group 1; they tended to be limited in Group 2 (especially in the 2 o'clock direction). Assessment using the Hill's classification showed that the gastroesophageal flap valve was preserved after SP-POEM.

conclusionSP-POEM is safe and effective, with a success rate of 90%. The rate of severe erosive esophagitis can be decreased by preserving sling fibers.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophagitis, PepticGastroesophageal RefluxMyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryEsophageal Sphincter, LowerEsophagoscopyHumansTreatment OutcomeAchalasiaCritical view of safetyGastroesophageal reflux diseaseOblique musclePeroral endoscopic myotomySling fiber

Identifiers

PMID34716481
OpenAlexW3210521237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.