SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2022
Prior endoscopic resection does not affect the outcome of secondary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Competing Mortality Redefines the Net Benefit of Additional Surgery After Endoscopic Resection for T1 Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- The Outcome of Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resections (CAL-WR) for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Endoscopic mesorectal dissection for precise rectal cancer staging: trespassing the boundaries of lumenal rectal interventions.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-term outcomes and lymph node metastasis following endoscopic resection with additional surgery or primary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of endoscopic or surgical resection in T1 colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Outcome of Completion Surgery after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2023Article
- Review
- Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) - rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection for the Treatment of Suspected T1 Colon Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Endorectal Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography of Complex Rectal Adenoma and Early Rectal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- COPS3 Promotes Proliferation, Invasion, and EMT of Colorectal Cancer Cells by MEK/ERK Pathway.Disease markers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt remains unclear the effect of prior endoscopic resection (ER) on the secondary surgery (SS) for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between primary surgery (PS) and ER followed by SS for T1 CRC.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Ovid for studies comparing PS with ER followed by SS for T1 colorectal cancer. The last search was performed on 18 May 2021. The primary outcomes were surgical parameters and the secondary outcomes were survival indicators. The meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Software (version 5.3).
resultsA total of fifteen studies published between 2013 and 2021 with 4349 patients were included in this meta-analysis finally. No significant difference was observed between the two groups for operative time (P = 0.75, WMD = 3.16, 95%CI [-15.88, 22.19], I
conclusionER followed by SS is feasible for T1 CRC with high-risk factors. The prior ER would not bring additional adverse effects to the SS. More advanced tools should be developed to improve the diagnostic accuracy for the high-risk factors before treatment for T1 CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.