ReviewPediatric radiology2021
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a comprehensive review of safety in children.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the Safety of Single-Center Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026Article
- Comparison of ultrasonographic (SonoVue) and radiographic (Imeron) contrast agents for intralesional application in the head and neck area: An in vitro study.Ultrasound (Leeds, England) · 2026Article
- Antibody Conjugation Strategies for Ultrasound Microbubbles: A Review of Bioconjugation Chemistry and Clinical Translation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Review
- Bubbles in the barely born-contrast-enhanced ultrasound in neonates: a single-center experience.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Microvascular ultrasound imaging of the neonatal brain: a scoping review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in urgent and emergent pediatric conditions: a comprehensive review.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Innovations in pediatric imaging: a scoping review of the past decade with case illustrations.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- The Safety of Ultrasound Contrast Agents in Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intracavernous and Intravenous Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Children: A Report of Five Cases and Review of the Literature.Pediatric discovery · 2026Article
- Quantum-edge synergy for dynamic acoustic compensation in ultrasound safety: a narrative review of tissue heterogeneity challenges.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Submicron-sized ultrasound contrast agents as therapeutic peptide delivery vehicles in type 1 diabetes.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Prediction of Microvessel Density in Pediatric Hepatoblastoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantitative Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Expanding Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Pathologies in Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microvascular Ultrasound Imaging in the Neonatal Brain: From Advanced Doppler to Super-Resolution.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Toxicity in Patients Treated for Childhood Cancer: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Research Progress on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Liver-Related Diseases.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Understanding Pediatric Kidney Transplant Rejection: Its Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Management Strategies.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Ultra-Microangiography (UMA) in Critically Ill Children with Acute Kidney Injury.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Sedation and anesthesia for imaging of the infant and neonate-a brief review.Pediatric radiology · 2024Review
- Intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast to critically ill pediatric patients.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been increasingly used in pediatric radiology practice worldwide. For nearly two decades, CEUS applications have been performed with the off-label use of gas-containing second-generation ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). Since 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the UCA Lumason for three pediatric indications: the evaluation of focal liver lesions and echocardiography via intravenous administration and the assessment of vesicoureteral reflux via intravesical application (contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography, ceVUS). Prior to the FDA approval of Lumason, numerous studies with the use of second-generation UCAs had been conducted in adults and children. Comprehensive protocols for clinical safety evaluations have demonstrated the highly favorable safety profile of UCA for intravenous, intravesical and other intracavitary uses. The safety data on CEUS continue to accumulate as this imaging modality is increasingly utilized in clinical settings worldwide. As of August 2021, 57 pediatric-only original research studies encompassing a total of 4,518 children with 4,906 intravenous CEUS examinations had been published. As in adults, there were a few adverse events; the majority of these were non-serious, although very rarely serious anaphylactic reactions were reported. In the published pediatric-only intravenous CEUS studies included in our analysis, the overall incidence rate of serious adverse events was 0.22% (10/4,518) of children and 0.20% (10/4,906) of all CEUS examinations. Non-serious adverse events from the intravenous CEUS were observed in 1.20% (54/4,518) of children and 1.10% (54/4,906) of CEUS examinations. During the same time period, 31 studies with the intravesical use of UCA were conducted in 12,362 children. A few non-serious adverse events were encountered (0.31%; 38/12,362), but these were most likely attributable to the bladder catheterization rather than the UCA. Other developing clinical applications of UCA in children, including intracavitary and intralymphatic, are ongoing. To date, no serious adverse events have been reported with these applications. This article reviews the existing pediatric CEUS literature and provides an overview of safety-related information reported from UCA uses in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.