Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716453›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2021

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a comprehensive review of safety in children.

Aikaterini Ntoulia, Sudha A Anupindi, Susan J Back, Ryne A Didier, Misun Hwang, Ann M Johnson, M Beth McCarville, Frederica Papadopoulou, Maciej Piskunowicz, Maria E Sellars and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Safety of Ultrasound Contrast Agents in Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microvascular Ultrasound Imaging in the Neonatal Brain: From Advanced Doppler to Super-Resolution.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aikaterini NtouliaDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. ntouliaa@chop.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-4873
Sudha A AnupindiDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Susan J BackDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Ryne A DidierDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Misun HwangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Ann M JohnsonDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
M Beth McCarvilleDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Frederica PapadopoulouPediatric Ultrasound Center, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maciej PiskunowiczDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Maria E SellarsDepartment of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USGdańsk Medical University · PLKing's College Hospital · GBSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Novel Ultrasound Indices of Intracranial Pressure and Brain Ischemia in Neonatal HydrocephalusR01NS119473 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Misun Hwang · 2020 to 2026
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been increasingly used in pediatric radiology practice worldwide. For nearly two decades, CEUS applications have been performed with the off-label use of gas-containing second-generation ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). Since 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the UCA Lumason for three pediatric indications: the evaluation of focal liver lesions and echocardiography via intravenous administration and the assessment of vesicoureteral reflux via intravesical application (contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography, ceVUS). Prior to the FDA approval of Lumason, numerous studies with the use of second-generation UCAs had been conducted in adults and children. Comprehensive protocols for clinical safety evaluations have demonstrated the highly favorable safety profile of UCA for intravenous, intravesical and other intracavitary uses. The safety data on CEUS continue to accumulate as this imaging modality is increasingly utilized in clinical settings worldwide. As of August 2021, 57 pediatric-only original research studies encompassing a total of 4,518 children with 4,906 intravenous CEUS examinations had been published. As in adults, there were a few adverse events; the majority of these were non-serious, although very rarely serious anaphylactic reactions were reported. In the published pediatric-only intravenous CEUS studies included in our analysis, the overall incidence rate of serious adverse events was 0.22% (10/4,518) of children and 0.20% (10/4,906) of all CEUS examinations. Non-serious adverse events from the intravenous CEUS were observed in 1.20% (54/4,518) of children and 1.10% (54/4,906) of CEUS examinations. During the same time period, 31 studies with the intravesical use of UCA were conducted in 12,362 children. A few non-serious adverse events were encountered (0.31%; 38/12,362), but these were most likely attributable to the bladder catheterization rather than the UCA. Other developing clinical applications of UCA in children, including intracavitary and intralymphatic, are ongoing. To date, no serious adverse events have been reported with these applications. This article reviews the existing pediatric CEUS literature and provides an overview of safety-related information reported from UCA uses in children.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaVesico-Ureteral RefluxAdultChildHumansIncidenceUltrasonographyUrinationContrast MediaAdverse eventsAdverse reactionsChildrenContrast-enhanced ultrasoundIntracavitaryIntravenousIntravesicalSafetyUltrasoundUltrasound contrast agents

Identifiers

PMID34716453
PMCPMC11459369
OpenAlexW3208814303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.