Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716388›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Resistance status of lepidopteran soybean pests following large-scale use of MON 87701 × MON 89788 soybean in Brazil.

Renato J Horikoshi, Oderlei Bernardi, Daniela N Godoy, Altair A Semeão, Alan Willse, Gustavo O Corazza, Elderson Ruthes, Davi de S Fernandes, Daniel R Sosa-Gómez, Adeney de F Bueno and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Distribution ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Laboratory and Greenhouse Assessments ofJournal of nematology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Renato J HorikoshiBayer Crop Science, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, SP, Brazil. renato.horikoshi@bayer.com.
Oderlei BernardiDepartamento de Defesa Fitossanitária, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Daniela N GodoyDepartamento de Defesa Fitossanitária, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Altair A SemeãoBayer Crop Science, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, SP, Brazil.
Alan WillseRegulatory Science, Bayer Crop Science US, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Gustavo O CorazzaBayer Crop Science, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, SP, Brazil.
Elderson RuthesFundação ABC, Castro, PR, Brazil.
Davi de S FernandesDepartamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Daniel R Sosa-GómezEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Paraná, PR, Brazil.
Adeney de F BuenoEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Paraná, PR, Brazil.
Celso OmotoDepartamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Geraldo U BergerBayer Crop Science, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alberto S CorrêaDepartamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Samuel MartinelliRegulatory Science, Bayer Crop Science US, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Patrick M DouradoBayer Crop Science, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Graham HeadRegulatory Science, Bayer Crop Science US, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Process # 142340/2018-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Process # 305398/2018Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Process # 305464/2020-5Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Process # 311465/2018-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Process # 312086/2013-0Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Grant number 2019/18282-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul Grant number 19/2551-0002289-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread adoption of MON 87701 × MON 89788 soybean, expressing Cry1Ac Bt protein and glyphosate tolerance, has been observed in Brazil. A proactive program was implemented to phenotypically and genotypically monitor Cry1Ac resistance in Chrysodeixis includens (Walker). Recent cases of unexpected injury in MON 87701 × MON 89788 soybean were investigated and a large-scale sampling of larvae on commercial soybean fields was performed to assess the efficacy of this technology and the distribution of lepidopteran pests in Brazil. No significant shift in C. includens susceptibility to Cry1Ac was observed eight years after commercial introduction of this technology in Brazil. F

Indexed as

Plants, Genetically ModifiedAnimalsBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBrazilEndotoxinsGlycine maxHemolysin ProteinsInsecticide ResistanceLarvaMothsPest Control, BiologicalBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus Thuringiensis

Identifiers

PMID34716388
PMCPMC8556339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.